Comments on: Our Joey is a follower, not a leader

By: Jack

Jack — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:07:09 +0000

No offence intended but why does all the discussion in here have to revolve around Ms. Ellul Bonici as if she were the beacon of Maltese politics? She is at best, a political dwarf, best forgotten.

By: Meerkat :)

Meerkat :) — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:41:21 +0000

@ europarl

Maybe this can help :-D

http://images.buycostumes.com/mgen/merchandiser/31388.jpg

By: Amanda Mallia

Amanda Mallia — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:37:08 +0000

Europarl – Give up! You’re no match for Corinne.

By: europarl

europarl — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:51:38 +0000

Good idea, Corinne Vella! Remind me on my next flight to your whereabouts. I guess provincial Korean should do.

By: Corinne Vella

Corinne Vella — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:32:12 +0000

Europarl / Kevin Ellul Bonici: When you hang up your cape and tights and pack away your arsenal of non-sequiturs, please rewrite your last message in earthling mode for the benefit of provincials.

By: europarl

europarl — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:22:07 +0000

“natural flipside”? hehe, Okay, I’ll give you that – in the spirit of the (super)imposed truce.

Besides, caped crusaders don’t hit on weaklings – we fly over mountains in search of damsels selling good acid to visit this blog.

By: Corinne Vella

Corinne Vella — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:47:28 +0000

Europarl / Kevin Ellul Bonici: It’s the natural flipside of the same question, actually.

Tell me, is the non-sequitur a weapon normally used by caped crusaders or are you in civvies and tripping on acid when you visit this blog?

By: europarl

europarl — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:39:16 +0000

True, Corinne, your “irony” is very much of the Tibetan sort.

Your second, very different, question makes more sense. Would you also like her shoe size?

But let me just say that there’s a time for everything. In any case, this would interest others much more than you.

By: Corinne Vella

Corinne Vella — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:19:33 +0000

Europarl / Kevin Ellul Bonici: I thought you knew all about irony. If I were in Tibet, I’d wouldn’t be too troubled by the machinations of the MLP as there would be the small matter of human rights violation to consider.

Let me rephrase my question. Since Sharon Ellul Bonici’s position is totally at odds with the MLP’s, why does she persist in trying to represent the MLP rather than starting her own party?

By: europarl

europarl — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:11:07 +0000

Corinne,

Are you serious? You’re asking “Why does the MLP want Sharon Ellul Bonici out of the way?”

(now I understand why your “replies” to me seem like coming out of Tibet…)

But hasn’t Jason told you: “ghax ewroxettika”?

The official judgement from the Court of the Three Wise Men is that Sharon’s principles on the EU go against the Party’s “principles”.

Meaning: SEB is critical of the soviet development of the EU, whereas MLP want to look like goody-goody Yes-men – they want to emulate the Gonzi clan. So they now kind of see it the way you do. You should be proud of the lot.

Besides, their mentors in the EP (the PES) would highly disapprove of Labour criticising the emergence of the new EU. So they prefer not to see any warts (there’s some good medicine for this – and it works, after some time you see no more warts: it’s called ‘political expediency’).

I mean just look at the greatest convert of them all: George of the Bungle Vella! Now that’s a puLiTiKant – a walking study in political expediency.

Kemm hu helu Gorg!