Comments on: After the budget, another spiza for Anglu

By: David Buttigieg

David Buttigieg — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:13:20 +0000

@Mario P

I do hope you have realized that they were talking about George Bush senior!

By: tony pace

tony pace — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:49:11 +0000

I thought the following should be transmitted to Joey. As I happen to know that he is an avid reader of your website, I am taking the liberty to communicate it to him throught this blog.

”Oxford University Corpus compiles a list of the top ten irritating phrases.”
By Charlotte Bailey
The top ten most irritating phrases:

1 – At the end of the day
2 – Fairly unique
3 – I personally
4 – At this moment in time
5 – With all due respect
6 – Absolutely
7 – It’s a nightmare
8 – 24/7
9 – It’s not rocket science
AND 10 HAS TO BE ……………YOU’VE GUESSED ”TRENDY”

u hallina Dott.

By: Dunstan

Dunstan — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:28:08 +0000

CONSTITUENCY…of course!!!

By: Dunstan

Dunstan — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:26:11 +0000

Richard has always been a prime target for Labour! His excellent qualities are the envy of their party but he always came out on top and kept his cool….even in very dark times for him! You must consider yourself lucky to live in Anglu`s constiuency….getting junk mail which can give you a smile or two.

[Daphne – Well, actually, I got a piece of junk mail which has now given me the enormous satisfaction of seeing that pompous fool a thousand euros out of pocket. The idiot should have told his canvassers to avoid my letterbox.]

By: Mario P

Mario P — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:42:39 +0000

Methinks the magistrate awarded nominal damages to prove the point that Anglu was a bad boy but did not deserve more than a slap on the hand. Interesting that GW is already being referred to as the ‘former’ while he still has till January to wreak more damage.

[Daphne – EUR1000 is not nominal at all. I speak as somebody with experience – though I must say that I got Lm1200 off Joseph Muscat.]

By: Clifford

Clifford — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:57:52 +0000

Daphne, I have a small suggestion. Why don’t you open a new archive section in this website and post all your articles and contributions prior to last March? I mean, you go back to even the dark ages. I’m sure they would make good reading, and you could remind us what made the news back then.

[Daphne – 1990 is hardly the dark ages. That requires an investment of many thousands of euros, so the answer is no, I won’t. You’re speaking of something like 1600 articles, many of which have to be retyped from the hard copy because computer systems have changed.]