<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Overdose	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/</link>
	<description>Daphne Caruana Galizia is a journalist working in Malta.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 17:32:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenneth Cassar		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17848</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Cassar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Ray Borg: Yawn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ray Borg: Yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Borg		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17847</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Borg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If, as you admit, &quot;over 52% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession may be incorrect, therefore, it would be correct to  say that only 48% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession. N&#039;est ce pas?

[&lt;strong&gt;Daphne - A piece of desperate elastic will only stretch so far, sir. What percentage of US registered voters voted for Obama? And on the strength of that &#039;very minority vote&#039;, he is the most powerful man in the world. Get a grip.]&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If, as you admit, &#8220;over 52% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession may be incorrect, therefore, it would be correct to  say that only 48% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession. N&#8217;est ce pas?</p>
<p>[<strong>Daphne &#8211; A piece of desperate elastic will only stretch so far, sir. What percentage of US registered voters voted for Obama? And on the strength of that &#8216;very minority vote&#8217;, he is the most powerful man in the world. Get a grip.]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenneth Cassar		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17846</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Cassar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Ray Borg:

&quot;Over 52% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession” may be incorrect, but &quot;Over 52% of those who voted favoured EU accession&quot; certainly is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ray Borg:</p>
<p>&#8220;Over 52% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession” may be incorrect, but &#8220;Over 52% of those who voted favoured EU accession&#8221; certainly is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenneth Cassar		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Cassar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@ Ray Borg:

I know that the Referenda Act gives the registered voters all three options.  How could it not?  Are we to expect police dragging people to the polling booths, or checking on people to see whether they have invalidated their votes?

And yes, the sum of those in favour is less than the votes against, invalid votes and abstentions.  It is also less than the sum of people yet to be born.  But what matters in referenda in the real world is the number of those who voted yes and the number of those who voted no.

But of course, some people will insist that &quot;partnership rebah&quot;.  Incredible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ray Borg:</p>
<p>I know that the Referenda Act gives the registered voters all three options.  How could it not?  Are we to expect police dragging people to the polling booths, or checking on people to see whether they have invalidated their votes?</p>
<p>And yes, the sum of those in favour is less than the votes against, invalid votes and abstentions.  It is also less than the sum of people yet to be born.  But what matters in referenda in the real world is the number of those who voted yes and the number of those who voted no.</p>
<p>But of course, some people will insist that &#8220;partnership rebah&#8221;.  Incredible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Borg		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17844</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Borg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Daphne
Please read again the Referenda Act (Cap 237) and you shall find that it speaks very clearly about registered voters. There is no mention of valid votes cast.

Kenneth Cassar
The Referenda Act gives the registered voter all the three options. What is sure in that result is the fact that the sum of those in favour is less than the votes against, invalid votes and abstentions.

Corinne
You asked a question and I gave you a reply.

May I let you all in a little secret? Mine was one of those 143,094 yes votes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daphne<br />
Please read again the Referenda Act (Cap 237) and you shall find that it speaks very clearly about registered voters. There is no mention of valid votes cast.</p>
<p>Kenneth Cassar<br />
The Referenda Act gives the registered voter all the three options. What is sure in that result is the fact that the sum of those in favour is less than the votes against, invalid votes and abstentions.</p>
<p>Corinne<br />
You asked a question and I gave you a reply.</p>
<p>May I let you all in a little secret? Mine was one of those 143,094 yes votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Corinne Vella		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17843</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corinne Vella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17843</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ray Borg:

Mine was a rhetorical question. I see you have missed the point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray Borg:</p>
<p>Mine was a rhetorical question. I see you have missed the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kenneth Cassar		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17842</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kenneth Cassar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re Ray Borg&#039;s explanation:

Well, that sure makes those who opposed EU membership stupid.  If they had not got that crazy idea to abstain or invalidate their vote, they might have got their way.

Of course, this is all assuming that those who abstained or invalidated their vote were against EU membership.  Try proving that!

It&#039;s amazing how there are still people who question such a clear-cut referendum result.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Ray Borg&#8217;s explanation:</p>
<p>Well, that sure makes those who opposed EU membership stupid.  If they had not got that crazy idea to abstain or invalidate their vote, they might have got their way.</p>
<p>Of course, this is all assuming that those who abstained or invalidated their vote were against EU membership.  Try proving that!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing how there are still people who question such a clear-cut referendum result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Borg		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17841</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Borg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17841</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@  Corinne Vella
You asked for an explanation of the referndum result. Here is my contribution and it is free
The objective of the Referenda Act (Cap.237) is for registered voters to decide either whether they approve a proposal or proposals set out in a resolution passed by the House of Representatives or whether they agree that a provision of law should be abrogated.
On the 8th of March, 2003, the electorate was asked to decide by means of a referendum on the proposal that Malta becomes a member of the EU on its enlargement due on 1st May, 2004
The Question put was: “Do you agree that Malta becomes a member of the European Union in the enlargement that will take place on 1 May 2004?

The registered voters had the option to vote in favour, vote against, abstain or invalidate their vote

The following figures emerge from the 2003 Referendum:

Registered Voters                                    297,881

Votes in Favour                                      143,094

Votes Against                                     123,628
Invalid Votes                                       3,928
Abstentions:
Registered Voters     297,881
Less Votes Cast       270,650 =                    27,231

Votes against(123,628)+Invalid+(3,928)+abstentions (27,231)add up to 154,787

Seen in the light of these figures, the claim that “over 52% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession” is not correct.
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ACT SPEAKS OF REGISTERED VOTERS.

Since mathematics is not an opinion I leave it up to you to work out the percentage of those who voted in favour.

[&lt;strong&gt;Daphne - The results of elections and referendums are not calculated on the total number of registered voters but on the total number of people who voted. I know that Labour Party supporters seem to have trouble understanding how democracy works, but give it a try and you might be pleasantly surprised that it&#039;s quite safe and normal out here.]&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@  Corinne Vella<br />
You asked for an explanation of the referndum result. Here is my contribution and it is free<br />
The objective of the Referenda Act (Cap.237) is for registered voters to decide either whether they approve a proposal or proposals set out in a resolution passed by the House of Representatives or whether they agree that a provision of law should be abrogated.<br />
On the 8th of March, 2003, the electorate was asked to decide by means of a referendum on the proposal that Malta becomes a member of the EU on its enlargement due on 1st May, 2004<br />
The Question put was: “Do you agree that Malta becomes a member of the European Union in the enlargement that will take place on 1 May 2004?</p>
<p>The registered voters had the option to vote in favour, vote against, abstain or invalidate their vote</p>
<p>The following figures emerge from the 2003 Referendum:</p>
<p>Registered Voters                                    297,881</p>
<p>Votes in Favour                                      143,094</p>
<p>Votes Against                                     123,628<br />
Invalid Votes                                       3,928<br />
Abstentions:<br />
Registered Voters     297,881<br />
Less Votes Cast       270,650 =                    27,231</p>
<p>Votes against(123,628)+Invalid+(3,928)+abstentions (27,231)add up to 154,787</p>
<p>Seen in the light of these figures, the claim that “over 52% of the Maltese electorate voted in favour of EU accession” is not correct.<br />
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ACT SPEAKS OF REGISTERED VOTERS.</p>
<p>Since mathematics is not an opinion I leave it up to you to work out the percentage of those who voted in favour.</p>
<p>[<strong>Daphne &#8211; The results of elections and referendums are not calculated on the total number of registered voters but on the total number of people who voted. I know that Labour Party supporters seem to have trouble understanding how democracy works, but give it a try and you might be pleasantly surprised that it&#8217;s quite safe and normal out here.]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: P Shaw		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17840</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[P Shaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Completely different topic:

Mark Foley (he was molested as a child in Florida by the priest from Gozo) is back in the news and broke his silence today after 2 years:

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081112/D94D9Q1O3.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely different topic:</p>
<p>Mark Foley (he was molested as a child in Florida by the priest from Gozo) is back in the news and broke his silence today after 2 years:</p>
<p><a href="http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081112/D94D9Q1O3.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://apnews.myway.com/article/20081112/D94D9Q1O3.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gerald		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2008/11/overdose/#comment-17839</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gerald]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=1106#comment-17839</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Everybody Hates Chris :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody Hates Chris :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 11/24 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: daphnecaruanagalizia.com @ 2026-03-28 23:53:54 by W3 Total Cache
-->