The showing of the voting document was only a strategy since they knew victory was tough for partnership. The fact that the leader had his document makes it easier to come up with the phoney percentages and make the result look more realistic.

Mr. Azzopardi, agreed 100%, Bondiplus was a real disgrace. Notwithstanding, the programme was useful. Instead of helping us making the right choice, it helped us to avoid making the wrong choice.

Corinne, I am not quite sure if you are referring to my comment. If yes: I was actually joking and now you are telling me that the truth is even funnier-or shall I say tragicomical ?

It probably is. I have a good idea who Ettore is now.

I suppose you think it’s worth trying.

[Daphne – Are you hovering round this blog during working-hours, and is your salary paid for through our taxes? I have a feeling it might be.]

I regret to inform you I have no idea of what you just said. Not Maltese fluent you see.

Yes. The point was to undermine the validity of the referendum and to then claim that ‘Partnership’ won.

If you work out how a referendum that is invalid is legal confirmation of a vote on another matter altogether that never took place, please explain. I still haven’t been able to work that one out.

@George Azzopardi – The man is a bloody opportunist, and unashamedly so. The people who vote PL deserve him and his “flexible” ideals, morals and principles; the rest of us don’t.