Comments on: Astrid Vella declares that she is not a sexually transmitted disease

By: Crocodile Dundee

Crocodile Dundee — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:32:25 +0000

In reply to marika mifsud. Is she also protesting about the Australia hall, mate?

By: Marku

Marku — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:15:38 +0000

Pixxikalda is indeed the best way to describe certain people.

By: jomar

jomar — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:01:33 +0000

@ P. Shaw

I can vouch for that!

By: FAA-R OUT

FAA-R OUT — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:51:52 +0000

Hmm pesce calda…the kitchen must be getting hot…

By: Ciccio2010

Ciccio2010 — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:35:31 +0000

When the libel case was instituted, someone had stated that the composition of MEPA’s Appeals Boards had been changed. One month on, the MEPA website is still showing that Dr. Ian Spiteri Bailey, reported to be Astrid’s lawyer on this matter, is on one of the Appeals Boards. Can this information be confirmed?
From MEPA website:

“The decisions of the Board are final, except on points of law decided by the Board, which may be challenged in the Court of Appeal.

The Board (1) is currently composed as follows:

Dr. Ian Spiteri Bailey
LL.D (Chairman)

Appointed Committee Members are:
Perit Saviour Borg
A. & C.E.

Dr. Conrad Thake
B.E. & A. (Hons.), MA, Ph.D. (Berkeley) A. & C.E”

By: Galian

Galian — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:01:17 +0000

In reply to P Shaw. I can confirm that not one of my comments about her has ever been published by timesofmalta.com.

By: marika mifsud

marika mifsud — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:36:14 +0000

Aren’t FAA holding a protest favur l-ambjent shortly?

On TV she mentioned the projects they were protesting about. At the end she casually mentioned that they were also protesting against the new Houses of Parliament as on some master plan or other there was written that they should take over some empty palazzo or other, so all government’s plans are illegal and have to be scrapped.

By: P Shaw

P Shaw — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 02:34:54 +0000

“the woman thinks she has a right to a place in public life without being mocked or criticised.”

The Times certainly beleives so: they publish every little statement issued by her in the name of FAA, irrispective of its news value (like Joseph’s quick trip under the French cultural programme), and they censor any online comments which are mildly critical of her.