i don’t find him mad just human like everyone else if some one is invited to a party it is rude not to make an appearance

Where is Tarragon? I want to go there.

Will all of you please stop repeating the obscenity uttered by that vulgar man Jose Herrera?

Does the magistrate keep both her hands on the table when seated next to Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando?

That’s a question that should be addressed to Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando’s partner in respect of the magistrate. Mrs Musumeci, too, thought that the magistrate had no secret agenda when she befriended her husband, and that she didn’t pose a threat to her relationship because she was older and physically unattractive while Mrs Musumeci, like Jeffrey’s partner, is lovely. Famous last thoughts.

@Fanon, buddy, put on your glasses and read here

http://www.judiciarymalta.gov.mt/file.aspx?f=576

Start with article 11. For the rest of the articles Scerri Herrera has, and continues to break, just go through this blog starting from end of January.

If you still can’t see them, I recommend Optika.

“Why would a nut-job attack the magistrate?” Because, they are, er, nuts! Nut jobs sometimes attack people who have become famous because of an obsession (e.g. Lennon’s killer) But you don’t answer the question. Although legally fine, how would you feel if somebody attacked the magistrate because they read where she was on your blog?

Feelings and acceptability come into it, not just whether it is legal. As you advised Raphael on an earlier post,

“I imagine you belong to the school of thought – the very same school embraced by the more Sicilian of our compatriots – that as long as it’s legal then it’s acceptable. I’m sorry to have to drag you kicking and screaming into an approximation of developed thought on the subject, Raphael, but not all that is legal is acceptable…”

Do you think publishing where she is in real time is acceptable? Would it be fine to have someone follow her and have a permanent live stream video of her with a GPS signal on a map of where to find her?

“That’s why you’ll never make a good journalist”

Please don’t bristle up and attack me. I support what you are doing and hope to help you to be more effective by refining your approach. I was always told that to attack the person rather than the argument was a Labour trait anyway.

A public profile does NOT negate your right to privacy, and regardless of Daphne’s bravado, I think she’s cutting it close to the bone with this blog post.

[Daphne – Well, I have news for you. I’ve worked in the media for 20-odd years and I know the rules. There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to prevent me, or anyone else, publishing information about where a magistrate and some politicians ate their dinner. This is completely different from breaking into their home to take pictures of them eating while in that home. If they don’t want other people to know that they were in a restaurant, they shouldn’t have gone there. End of story. Quite frankly, I’m never surprised when it’s the Labour voters who come out with this rubbish. It’s not so much that they’re protecting a Labour magistrate, but that they just DON’T UNDERSTAND free speech issues and want another chance to prove it.]

Naming the precise restaurant they were dining at was not the smartest of moves – writing this post while simply limiting the description to “a certain restaurant in St Paul’s Bay”, or writing about the dinner only once it was over, would have been much smarter.

[Daphne – Smarter in what way, exactly? Grow up, please. It’s becoming increasingly obvious just how cut off this country is from reality.]