Comments on: The bunny-boilers are now REALLY confused

By: Tal-Muzew

Tal-Muzew — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:20:11 +0000

In reply to TROY.

http://www.mysummit.tv/cms/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/man-against-wall1.gif

By: Tal-Muzew

Tal-Muzew — Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:19:30 +0000

In reply to TROY.

http://www.reconis.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/Man-Sticks-to-Wall-224×300.png

By: TROY

TROY — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:30:51 +0000

@ Riya, jien bhalek nahsiba imma dawn ma jafux ahjar. Il-web site gdida tal PL: Ghalgolhajt .com

By: Riya

Riya — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 16:39:13 +0000

Jien ma’ nistax nifhem fejn iridu jaslu dawn in-nies? Qishom qatta boloh. Jien ma’ nafx ghalfejn noqghodu naghtu widhen ghall-hmerijiet li qed jghidu. Jien affarijiet bis-sens irrid naqra ha nkun nista’ niddiskuti u nitghallem, u nsir naf il-korruzzjoni ta’ nies b’certu poteri. Bhal Magistrat Consuelo Scerri Herrera u ohrajn!

By: Overestimated Shakespeare aka Nostradamus formerly Avatar

Overestimated Shakespeare aka Nostradamus formerly Avatar — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 13:44:59 +0000

In reply to Corinne Vella.

Actually, “when he reads Daphne daughter of the slaves.”

The point is that they consider it demeaning that one might have a manumitted slave as one’s ancestor, and they think Austin Sammut will be vexed because his ancestry (same as Daphne’s) has been exposed.

Utter rubbish. Nevertheless, even at the risk of sounding repetitive: THEY ARE TRYING TO DERAIL US FROM WHAT COULD TURN OUT TO BE ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT TURNING POINTS IN THE RUNNING OF THE MALTESE STATE: THE TENURE OF A MAGISTRATE’S OFFICE.

By: Lomax

Lomax — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 07:17:30 +0000

I cannot stomach this any longer. These people are trying to debase you because you have a “humble” background. I mean, how insulting is that to the humble people who have been voting for them for years, for generations?

Even if you were the direct descendant of ‘slaves’, it doesn’t make you less intelligent, less articulate or, indeed, less of a human being. This is what astounds me. For all their running about and claiming that they are “tal-haddiema” they try to debase you on the basis of who you descended from. Isn’t this a contradiction in terms? Isn’t this a party which is supposed to promote the cause of the poor and the “lowly”?

Now, if one descended from thugs, that’s different – because being humble in origin has its own merits but being thuggish, being violent and being, generally, the equivalent of a mine even in times of peace, is downright dangerous.

Still, I am totally flabbergasted: they treat even their own voters with contempt.

By: Pittma

Pittma — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 00:04:32 +0000

In reply to Ta' Ninu. In which case, it should have read "U Giezu Giez"

By: Ta' Ninu

Ta' Ninu — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 22:30:17 +0000

For God’s sake guys, give up on these monkeys. They have become a bad joke, certainly not worth bothering about. Just think how proud they will be making us when they are elected to government. U Gis u Gis. (The g’s are meant to have a tikka.)

By: La Redoute

La Redoute — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:34:36 +0000

In reply to Corinne Vella.

Oh, right. So that was really ‘lil’ and not a spelling mistake.

It’s even worse than I thought.

By: La Redoute

La Redoute — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 21:32:52 +0000

In reply to Charles Crawford.

The mystery is not what they said about Charles Crawford – it’s what they meant to say. I haven’t understood. Have you?