Comments on: Embarrassment has two Rs

By: TROY

TROY — Thu, 20 May 2010 06:39:48 +0000

Charles J Buttigieg, nahseb thallatni ma hadd iehor, pero ma jimpurtax. Jien lilek ma nsolontajtekx anzi ghedt il-verita, ghax issa inti thossok dghajjef ghax spicca dak iz-zmien meta xi hadd jiddetta lil-xi ministru lil min jista jghati job. U int taf bizzejed jien min jien siehbi.

By: Charles J Buttigieg

Charles J Buttigieg — Mon, 17 May 2010 12:22:20 +0000

In reply to Charles J Buttigieg. Troy jekk int bravu biex tikkoregi lill haddiehor ghandek tkun bravu bizzejjed meta xi hadd jikkoregik. Bli-insulti ma tasal imkien speccjalment meta tahbi l-identita tieghek.

By: TROY

TROY — Sun, 16 May 2010 14:30:13 +0000

In reply to Charles J Buttigieg. Kemm int bravu, Charles J Buttigieg. Ghalhekk hadt promotion wara l-ohra ma' AIR LABOUR.

By: Charles J Buttigieg

Charles J Buttigieg — Sun, 16 May 2010 12:21:53 +0000

In reply to S K. Just name one politician who is different in that regard. Go on, name just one.

By: Charles J Buttigieg

Charles J Buttigieg — Sun, 16 May 2010 05:39:09 +0000

In reply to JoeM. The term is 'Chairing' not 'charing' nor 'charring' . lol

By: M Borg

M Borg — Sat, 15 May 2010 22:30:02 +0000

In reply to M Borg. It was a man's agreement, not a contract! And it is only one's right to withdraw from an oral agreement when the other party in the agreement is not playing fair. [Daphne - A man's agreement as opposed to a gentleman's agreement, do you mean? I'm with you on that.]

By: Joe Vella

Joe Vella — Sat, 15 May 2010 12:55:24 +0000

The mission of the PL media is to keep thier viewers ignorant of what is happening around them. Poor souls, after election they all ask the same question. What happened?

By: Charles J Buttigieg

Charles J Buttigieg — Sat, 15 May 2010 11:27:43 +0000

Without comments.

From the today’s Times.
Dennis Zammit(2 hours, 8 minutes ago)
@ J.C. Forte

If not mistaken, you are confiormaing that the people DID NOT even want the MLP to run the Govt.!!!

So on whart basis do you expect this Govt. hand over the country to an illegimate party with a non-elected and non-voted leader?

Why should you decide for me?

The 1981 problem is totally different.

[Daphne – Your point being?]

By: Albert Farrugia

Albert Farrugia — Fri, 14 May 2010 06:29:54 +0000

Call these shenanigans, or whatever else you like. The point is, that a government survives only if it can command a majority in the House of Representatives. What do you expect the Opposition to do? Ignore the fact that it has only one seat less than the government and just give it a walk-over? If the government is feeling uncomfortable with its wafer-thin majority, all it has to do is call a general election and campaign for a bigger majority. It´s THAT simple in a democracy.

[Daphne – No, it isn’t. Each time a general election is called, the uncertainty screws up trading and business right across the board.]

By: eros

eros — Thu, 13 May 2010 21:25:11 +0000

The Government should have realised by now that you can’t trust this man. If they really believe that by being obstructive and acting like spoilt brats, stamping their feet when things don’t turn out their way, that they are gaining any floating vote, then they really need some good advice.

This attitude reflects clearly that spewing out of the two deputy leaders, and will only help to reinforce the PN members in their unity. Naturally the PL media will keep on feeding their mob that the government is unstable and will fall any minute – and of course they readily believe such crap.

The PN should not trust Muscat and rather they should persist in ensuring that voting in parliament is done when it suits the majority.