“The Labour Party is the natural haven for people like that.” Most Nationalists believe this to be gospel truth. However a Machiavellian PN supporter may have done this dastardly deed exactly for that reason. To push more blame onto the obvious suspects – every heard of someone being framed – this could very well be the case and I therefore offer it up only as a possibility – I have no facts – is all just supposition. Because the most obvious explanation is almost invariably the true one and I laid stress on the word could. Nobody knows and that’s that.

Interestingly, the most well known (whether you like it or not) software company out there uses a backward-compatible policy.
Yes, I’m speaking about Microsoft. You can’t deny their success.

I can’t understand with what kind of idiocy you try to compare a political party with a hardware company. Consider (for a fact) that no one aiming at modding would ever buy an Apple product, since it is non-backward compatible (and neither forward compatible for the matter), I might go as far as to say that Apple products are fuds – stuck in time.

But who cares, consumerists don’t think, they buy – and there’s plenty of them out there.

guesses guesses guesses. before pointing fingers we need proof!!
How can one instigate that Muscat or Labour had anything to do with this? Mela ok jekk jinqatel xi hadd quddiem il bieb tieghek u ftit qabel kellek argument mieghu nghid li int qtiltu allura?

proof, proof, proof! imagine our courts start making educated guesses! I prefer a criminal not caught than an innocent person in jail.

This act could have been one of hatred, it could have been a random vandalism (untargeted) and also could have been a way of making the “enemy” in a bad light….
I’m sorry but it seams your “intelligent” guess is just the same as a narrow minded guess. please use a wide-angle lens when no proof is available.

thanks queeny for trying to point this out

If you are so good in English I’d like you to correct me so that I will learn. Normally to substantiate an argument such as this you would need much more than that paragraph and i’m not willing to waste my time explaining when things are this obvious.

M Borg: you might be immersed in law but you need:

1. to go back to school and learn English

2. to substantiate your arguments.

I saw someone here comparing Joseph to Hitler, I call Godwin’s law, and hyperbole! Hitler engineered an infrastructure to kill millions of people; he built a war machine and ran it through a caste of barbarous, ill-educated, psychopaths; he built a propaganda machine with the sole purpose of dehumanizing his enemies as vermin which he explicitly marked for death.

Call me crazy but I don’t think there’s a comparison here.

Inkredibbli l-mod kif tahsbu! Il-poplu ghandu dritt ikun jaf x’inhu jigri, il-poplu ghandu dritt jipprotesta, u l-opposizzjoni tkun biss qed taghmel xoghlha meta tissalvagwardja d-drittijiet tal-maltin. Kieku ma jkunx hemm opposizzjoni l-gvern jaghmel aktar li jrid u ma jkunx jista jinzamm accountable lejn il-poplu. Ma tista bl-ebda mod tara dan bhala istigazzjoni biex issir xi haga kundannabli bhal din! Ahna rridu d-demokrazija jew le?? Issa li jkun hawn certu nies li jaghmlu haga kundannabli bhal din, dan ifisser biss li ghad ghandna nies immaturi u kull agir bhal dan huwa hazin u kundannabli pero bl-ebda mod ma tista’ tatribwixxi l-fatt mal-mod kif qed jagixxu l-MP tan-naha tal-opposizzjoni.

a 1 euro contract and 160 million euro contract have basic things in common my friend. Even more so, in a 160 million euro contract things should be seen to be done much more correctly. Firstly, it is obvious that things have been done in this way because there are people who are getting huge sums of money. If one tries to read the contract one would immediately agree that things haven’t been done rightly so and thus there are only 2 options: either who done the contract is incompetent and shouldn’t be in government, or who done the contract is corrupt. I leave it up to you to decide, but in my opinion it is pretty clear. The Auditor General has acted like that investigating company who knows that there has been fraud committed but can’t catch who done it because it has been covered so well.

Alfred Sant tried to and succeeded in cleaning the party of its filthy scum. When Muscat came on the scene, he opened the gates to that scum, trying to build up the lost votes. Carry on, Joseph, you are sliding the party back to the filthy 1980s.

Daphne, I choose my friends and political, religious and other beliefs are not in the criteria. Probably I have more friends who vote PN than I have Labourites; truth is I don’t give it much thought. Loving one lot and hating all the others is not just radical it’s sadly pathetic. And I’m sure you share these values.