Comments on: An unbelievably hot news item from the Labour Party's news site, today

By: marco desira

marco desira — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:11:43 +0000

In reply to Brian.

Brian….. rispett huwa dovut fejn hu xieraq…

By: erskinmay

erskinmay — Fri, 06 Aug 2010 21:53:45 +0000

In reply to Fontana. No. You're mistaken.

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 19:09:23 +0000

Hmmmm. Translating what the labour party (and no capitals pls.) meant to say is this…..Dear DCG, please stop being a thorn in our arse….it really hurts!
Well, tough shite dear J.M. & Co., DCG is here to stay ( not that I agree with her comments all the time) However……what DCG represents is, DEMOCRACY (wish I can underline it too!). The afore mentioned word, for the new l.p. or m.l.p. or whatever this so called new image political party represents has no meaning….cause it’s a taboo word for them.

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:55:18 +0000

In reply to marco desira.

Would ‘Madoffi’ do for you Mr. Desira?! It’s what comes before the name of the Blessed Virgin that names our religion in vain. May I ask you this and do kindly reply….how many times have you heard the Lord’s name in vain …..and intervened?? Take a stroll to our Law Courts and down Republic Street in Valletta or how about a village festa…Now that’s where YOU should tell off people to refrain from naming our Lord’s name in vain.

By: Silvio Farrugia

Silvio Farrugia — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 18:29:01 +0000

Do you not remember the recent court judgment when the PL media was ordered to pay about euro 50,000 for infringing copyright on music? Is this the way they will govern? What a bunch of amateurs.

By: red nose

red nose — Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:42:07 +0000

We have to remember that tragically, the vote of a person who can spell has exactly the same value of the vote of a person who cannot spell correctly.

By: Line Cert

Line Cert — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:43:24 +0000

In reply to Tonio. I think they were trying to say "looser"

By: Salvu Felice Pace

Salvu Felice Pace — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:07:45 +0000

“with a back page talking point attacking Joseph Muscat for commenting on Dr Gonzi’s…..”
Now it so happens that I wrote that Talking Point but Malta Star editor is incapable of understanding the difference between attacking someone for commenting and attacking the comment. Too subtle for him.
By the way I tried to find the article this evening to send my comment, but it has been taken away. If I’m right, I wonder why?

By: C Falzon

C Falzon — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 19:34:51 +0000

I see they still have a surplus of question marks? Or maybe they don’t know how to write a question?
Anyway A.G is appealing the judgement so A/F (I.G) must be right no ? And D/C g must be wrong no ?

By: Tonio Farrugia

Tonio Farrugia — Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:58:19 +0000

“Cogent arguments|”.
What’s cogent about them?