Comments on: By order of the Chief Justice, 21 cases involving politicians and journalists are removed from Consuelo Herrera and transferred to another magistrate

By: TROY

TROY — Sun, 24 Oct 2010 07:01:21 +0000

In reply to Palestina. Biddlu l-emblema u n-nies, le.

By: Red Nose

Red Nose — Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:26:57 +0000

Another “get out” polite hint by a new judge!

By: Riya

Riya — Sat, 23 Oct 2010 08:37:57 +0000

How come this very important issue was not mentioned in the media? Prosit tassew Daphne.

By: Mario Farrugia

Mario Farrugia — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:10:18 +0000

How about some criticism for the person who has just given bail to a violent criminal involved in the HSBC hold up?
The criminal with a long record, no fixed address and a habit of shooting at Police. Given bail! And not by Consuelo Scerri Herrera.

By: Joseph A Borg

Joseph A Borg — Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:31:35 +0000

In reply to Antoine Vella. So you don't think that a psychiatrist should sit for exams either? It's a career move that requires a different set of skills beyond those s/he studied to become a doctor. Bonello makes a very similar argument in regard of magistrates and judges.

By: red nose

red nose — Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:40:54 +0000

Should the Police know of these threats?

By: Jason Palestina

Jason Palestina — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:30:27 +0000

In reply to A.Charles. se taqbad mal perit isa? qabda hodor imnejjkin min mohjkom

By: Jason Palestina

Jason Palestina — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:29:49 +0000

In reply to Rover. hja nejdlek xbin jien u jose hobza w sikina ok? int xi mahmug iehor bhal dinnittina thawn fuq?

By: Jason Palestina

Jason Palestina — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:26:01 +0000

In reply to Fair deal. eja buli ha naraw minhu bully u jinheba wara lis-screen ejdli min int ha naraw minhu bully bezzieh bewwiel u int dahpne aqtaha itlaqlu lill-jose mandekx xi tridu ha tqabizilna ha nejdlek

By: ciccio2010

ciccio2010 — Mon, 18 Oct 2010 12:45:47 +0000

In reply to John Schembri.

Daphne, you repeat your view that the “decision by the electorate” means a mandate at a general election. But in your view, what does the PM mean when he says he will have a discussion by the MPs and then the matter will be subject to popular mandate? What is that supposed to mean and how would it work?

Normally, when the electorate votes on a matter, the matter is then drafted into a law and discussed in Parliament, but only after the decision by the electorate.

I will seek an explanation of this in Bondi+ today.

[Daphne – So will I.]