Comments on: Whose side is Labour on?

By: Riya

Riya — Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:58:38 +0000

tony10. Can you please explain what Maltafile are u talking about? Was it about corruption?

By: TROY

TROY — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:06:35 +0000

Keep on entertaining us Daphne.

By: TROY

TROY — Fri, 19 Nov 2010 08:04:50 +0000

In reply to john Doe. The fire came from Labour's torch.

By: tony10

tony10 — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:24:38 +0000

Well the double face are GONZIPN my dear you forgot in the 80’s they use to go with the maltafile and telling the germans not to invest in malta you forgot all the disloyalty the PN did to us as a maltese nation what you pretend that we The labour supporters be part of all this corrupt contract the difference between GONZI and JOSEPH is GONZI wants and mebrasses corruption and JOSEPH does not allowit one bit stop and think before you talk for one time in your sorry life do the decent thing and f— off

By: Anthony Farrugia

Anthony Farrugia — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:04:36 +0000

In reply to Riya. Not to mention the high rate of pilfering from Air Supplies (was Air Malta subsidiary) which used to stock wines and spirits, perfumes and fragrances, tobacco products and such like for the duty-free shops; xalata shiha kien hemm u kieku biss inqabad xi gurdien.

By: Riya

Riya — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:06:35 +0000

John Doe, Labour created the smoke. This is public knowledge now as this done with every tender. If they knew anything, or had some sort of information, there was nothing to stop them from going to the police themselves.

The Prime Minister told them this on several occasions but they opted to continue to throw mud without any concrete evidence. This clearly confirms that their allegations were unfounded.

Why did not inspector Gadget do the same thing as he did with the issue of the buying of votes in the last election?

By: H Mizzi

H Mizzi — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 13:33:07 +0000

If the NAO deduced that there was smoke in his investigations regarding BWSC, there was definitely fire somewhere. What is evident and worrying is the smokescreen our Prime Minister LG and his parliamentary group, especially Dr Austin Gatt,
have surrounded the source with, attempting by all means to hide it from the electorate.

By: Reuben Scicluna

Reuben Scicluna — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:22:56 +0000

In reply to TROY.

Daphne, I refuse to believe that you misunderstood me. You know perfectly well that who needs to be changed – from your perspective – does not read what you write. And Troy – unwittingly and unwillingly – has just pointed it out.
What would you rather I had said? Hectoring the converted, perhaps?

[Daphne – No, I entertain. People don’t read newspaper columns to be informed, preached at or converted to another point of view, but to be entertained in various fashions. This piece of knowledge is my secret weapon.]

By: cikku l-poplu

cikku l-poplu — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 07:38:41 +0000

In reply to john Doe. Dak li qal l-Accountant General kien, li kampanja tal PL fuq korruzzjoni kienet kollha duhhan.Min jaf ghalfejn kienet din il kampanja feroci forsi riedu li xi hadd tal-qalba laburist li jiehu il kuntratt biex jaqsmu mieghu jew kienu mwedin xi flus ghal partit min xi kumpanija barranija jekk.il malti jghid lill min tafu tistaqsiex ghalih u min jitwieled tond ma jmutx kwadru.tal-PL dejjem hekk kienu jew naqsam mieghek jew insalbek u hekk qed jaghmlu b'din il kampanja ta' korruzzjoni.

By: Reuben Scicluna

Reuben Scicluna — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 05:04:03 +0000

In reply to TROY. Has it occurred to you, Troy, that you have just said that Daphne is preaching to the converted? [Daphne - I'm not preaching, Reuben. I have no interest in converting anyone. I'm not in the business of religion or politics.]