<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A must-read	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/</link>
	<description>Daphne Caruana Galizia is a journalist working in Malta.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:33:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Reuben Scicluna		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69451</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reuben Scicluna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69451</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The validity of Bondi&#039;s point is limited. The way I see it, regulating cohabitation is a sort of &quot;damage containment&quot; exercise.

Nobody is saying that marriage breakdowns and subsequent cohabitation are OK, but it happens all the time so from a &quot;societal&quot; point of view there has to be some sort of regulation. Honour-among-thieves sort of thing.

Divorce won&#039;t add to the existing &quot;chaos&quot;.  It is purely an ethical/moral issue.

It is bad enough that people can&#039;t or won&#039;t adhere to a set of established and proven values, but issuing an &quot;official&quot; declaration that it&#039;s OK to look upon marriage as something that can be undone is something else again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The validity of Bondi&#8217;s point is limited. The way I see it, regulating cohabitation is a sort of &#8220;damage containment&#8221; exercise.</p>
<p>Nobody is saying that marriage breakdowns and subsequent cohabitation are OK, but it happens all the time so from a &#8220;societal&#8221; point of view there has to be some sort of regulation. Honour-among-thieves sort of thing.</p>
<p>Divorce won&#8217;t add to the existing &#8220;chaos&#8221;.  It is purely an ethical/moral issue.</p>
<p>It is bad enough that people can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t adhere to a set of established and proven values, but issuing an &#8220;official&#8221; declaration that it&#8217;s OK to look upon marriage as something that can be undone is something else again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kramer		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69450</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kramer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 22:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69449&quot;&gt;TROY&lt;/a&gt;.

it spells WOW not whaw, you ignorant twat! Troy do us all a favour and go suck on your thumb in the corner before coming here blubbering nonsense!

&lt;strong&gt;[Daphne - Errrr, I guess you don&#039;t do sarcasm or irony. Read back Ray Spiteri&#039;s comments and try to work out why Troy wrote WHAW and not Wow.]&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69449">TROY</a>.</p>
<p>it spells WOW not whaw, you ignorant twat! Troy do us all a favour and go suck on your thumb in the corner before coming here blubbering nonsense!</p>
<p><strong>[Daphne &#8211; Errrr, I guess you don&#8217;t do sarcasm or irony. Read back Ray Spiteri&#8217;s comments and try to work out why Troy wrote WHAW and not Wow.]</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TROY		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TROY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69447&quot;&gt;Ray Spiteri&lt;/a&gt;.

Whaw! Ray Spiteri likes Joseph&#039;s, and his madding crowd&#039;s speaches, how sweeeeeeet.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69447">Ray Spiteri</a>.</p>
<p>Whaw! Ray Spiteri likes Joseph&#8217;s, and his madding crowd&#8217;s speaches, how sweeeeeeet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ciccio2011		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69448</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ciccio2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69448</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69447&quot;&gt;Ray Spiteri&lt;/a&gt;.

Ray, what does &quot;ex pn&quot; mean?  Does it mean you are now part of the PL?

Tell us, how does it feel to be part of the same party of the 1970s which the PN fought against on the streets and against which the PN has now won 6 out of 7 general elections...and one out of one referendum?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69447">Ray Spiteri</a>.</p>
<p>Ray, what does &#8220;ex pn&#8221; mean?  Does it mean you are now part of the PL?</p>
<p>Tell us, how does it feel to be part of the same party of the 1970s which the PN fought against on the streets and against which the PN has now won 6 out of 7 general elections&#8230;and one out of one referendum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Spiteri		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69447</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Spiteri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 19:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[whaw, daphne likes lou bondi`s pen.  how sweet.  i hope you called him up and urged him now to write something vs PL.
ex pn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whaw, daphne likes lou bondi`s pen.  how sweet.  i hope you called him up and urged him now to write something vs PL.<br />
ex pn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe Micallef		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Micallef]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 18:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69445&quot;&gt;Interested Bystander&lt;/a&gt;.

Interested bystander do you remember Dave Allen?

In comparison to my mate’s views, Allen’s take on religion and religious orders would be considered as a very mild curry not hot enough to feature on the menu of a entry level Indian curry house.

So I am not happy to repeat them!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69445">Interested Bystander</a>.</p>
<p>Interested bystander do you remember Dave Allen?</p>
<p>In comparison to my mate’s views, Allen’s take on religion and religious orders would be considered as a very mild curry not hot enough to feature on the menu of a entry level Indian curry house.</p>
<p>So I am not happy to repeat them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Interested Bystander		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69445</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Interested Bystander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 17:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69445</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69443&quot;&gt;Joe Micallef&lt;/a&gt;.

Ask your mate what he thinks of the Roman Catholic Church declaring nul and void the marriages of couples who have had children.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69443">Joe Micallef</a>.</p>
<p>Ask your mate what he thinks of the Roman Catholic Church declaring nul and void the marriages of couples who have had children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ciccio2011		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ciccio2011]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 17:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69441&quot;&gt;Jojo&lt;/a&gt;.

Lou Bondi does not have to take a stand of the sort &quot;If the PN is against divorce, I will resign.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69441">Jojo</a>.</p>
<p>Lou Bondi does not have to take a stand of the sort &#8220;If the PN is against divorce, I will resign.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe Micallef		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69443</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe Micallef]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bondi introduces his piece suggesting that religion should not be involved but then makes religion the basis of his argument.

I see the choice in favour or against divorce as the choice between a society founded on the family unit to one that is founded on the individual and I am not comfortable with the latter.

If cohabitation law is moving to something to that same affect, than I am not even comfortable with that.

When faced with this decision one is then free to choose what forms his decision, for some it could be the Roman Catholic Church and for other is could be Disney Land

For all it matters a British acquaintance of mine thinks divorce has ruined the UK - he is a hard core atheist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bondi introduces his piece suggesting that religion should not be involved but then makes religion the basis of his argument.</p>
<p>I see the choice in favour or against divorce as the choice between a society founded on the family unit to one that is founded on the individual and I am not comfortable with the latter.</p>
<p>If cohabitation law is moving to something to that same affect, than I am not even comfortable with that.</p>
<p>When faced with this decision one is then free to choose what forms his decision, for some it could be the Roman Catholic Church and for other is could be Disney Land</p>
<p>For all it matters a British acquaintance of mine thinks divorce has ruined the UK &#8211; he is a hard core atheist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lomax		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lomax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=9381#comment-69442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69440&quot;&gt;Loyalist&lt;/a&gt;.

Actually we already have the concept of no fault in separation whereby there is no &quot;guilty spouse&quot;. No fault divorce would be nothing new.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/02/a-must-read/#comment-69440">Loyalist</a>.</p>
<p>Actually we already have the concept of no fault in separation whereby there is no &#8220;guilty spouse&#8221;. No fault divorce would be nothing new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 14/23 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: daphnecaruanagalizia.com @ 2026-04-21 03:17:00 by W3 Total Cache
-->