Oh, look. You’re back.

The point is that you *do* return to the scene. How you get here is secondary.

La Redoute, you wrote: “…which explains why you scroll back through several posts and reams of comments to pick up where you left off.”

Here’s a free tip to save on time:

Go to the thread (in my case a very few) – ctrl+F – type in ‘La Redoute’, click ‘enter’, then ‘previous’ for your last post.

It takes two seconds, La Redoute.

Ray, ghadek ma’ wegibtnix fuq tal-habbaghaziz.

I retract what I wrote previously.
It would be a grave insult to the mouse.

By that measure, if Christopher Booker posts a comment here I’d think he’s Corinne Vella. How egocentric can you get, Daphne? Can’t you possibly see how ridiculous you are?

[Daphne – No, kev, not if Christopher Booker uses his own name. For that same reason, you never think that Antoine Vella might be me or Corinne, even though the similarities in style are acute, because you know he is a ‘real person using a real name’.]

Wrong. Labour don’t know or care enough about the rule of law. Why else do they make such a mess of everything?

“acolytes, flatterers and imitators”

Inti taf tisthi?

Allura? Konna nafu li kien daqshekk korrot?

Forsi kien ihallina inhaffru ghaz-zejt.Tajnih rigal tal-pracett tat-tifla.

Gieh ir-Republika tajnih lil Ceaucescu u lil Gaddafi fiz-zminijiet tad-deheb.Ghamilna sew?

Din bhal meta tara fuq it-televixin lil Gonzi jkellem lil Berlusconi. Allura x’suppost jaghmel, jibqa’ ghaddej u ma jkellimx lil girien?

It’s the mindset, not the ‘”perfectly idiomatic” English, that tells me it’s her. Your knee-jerk reply says it all.

[Daphne – Really? You must have missed the same knee-jerk reply by H. P. Baxxter, who is also assumed to be me or one of mine, by the idiots in your fold. The mindset and the use of language go together, Kev.]