ciccio, they should have been thrown ‘overboard’ a long time ago

I suppose the solution to that problem could be that of putting a clause in the marriage law that renders men who have been convicted of violence against their spouse unfit to re-marry.

[Daphne – You can’t stop people marrying. If a woman wants to marry a wife-beater, then that’s her choice. When you are over 18 you don’t need permission to marry and you can marry who you please, as long as they are free and willing to marry you.]

[Daphne – Men don’t need to marry women to batter them, John.]

Furthermore, the duo Bartolo & Pullicino Orlando (sounds like a music-hall act from the 1930s) are the worst possible figure-heads for the pro-divorce movement and will put off some voters from voting Yes.

A propos the referendum, let’s get the rules of engagement laid down in stone BEFORE voting.

No one wants a repetition of the EU referendum result when you-know-who added up the abstainers to the No vote and declared a premature victory.

Harry, but as someone mentioned in one of the recent posts, we have witnessed a couple of drama queens on the board.

Prosit ta’ din ir-risposta.

I bet you hadn’t thought of that.

What’s hysterical about it?

‎”No divorce for battered women ‘because their abusers will also remarry”!

Quite right, Baxxter. There are no kings, queens, or knights on this board, only jackasses.

Surely you mean ‘tempering’ with Jaffrey’s cell phone.