Jibki dmugh tal-kukkudrilli quddiem Alfred Sant.

Jahdem minn wara dahar il-kap tal-partit tieghu stess.

Jigdeb il-qorti taht gurament.

Issa qalbi qed tehbirni li bi skop qed jilghaq lil tan-naha l-ohra.

Nispera li fl-elezzjoni generali li jmiss in-Nazzjonalisti ma jerggghux itellghuh.

Veru gakbin.

http://www.maltastar.com/pages/r1/ms10dart.asp?a=14470

“He said that despite he knows of families that encounterign difficulties and are suffering because their marriage was unsuccessful, he still remain against divorce.”

And this is the news website run by a political party that wants to govern.

He has already commited political suicide particularly in his God-fearing constituency. It is a question of when, not if.

Your “Divorce just unties an unwanted knot” is another way of agreeing with me when I referred to “mutually connived change-partners”.

The anti-divorce lobby is not being “petty and insecure” unless you admit that you are being just as insecure and just as petty yourself.

It is proven that divorce in itself (as a legal option) does not increase the likelihood of marriage dissolutions. We are so keen on democracy, freedom of speech ecc .. and yet here you are saying “ma nafx kif il-parlament ghandu il-gazz iparla fuq it-tkissir tal-familja?”

Mela we’re not living in the same century jew? It’s 2011. Only us and the Philippines did not legislate for divorce yet. But as usual, we are a supreme nation endowed with stratospheric intelligence, therefore we are better than the rest of the world … u la nghidu le ghad-divorzju ifisser li ahna biss ghandna ragun fid-dinja.

What’s the big deal? If divorce is legislated .. so what? Let it be an option for those who wish to avail themselves from it. If you are strongly against it, then simply do not opt for divorce. And yes, same thing goes for abortion (an issue which will take another 50 years for someone to actually have the guts to really do something about it.) Let it be available for whoever opts for it .. if there are any consequences to it, then it will be that person who will suffer them, not you.

“mutually connived change-partners” ?

A couple does not really need divorce to change partners. Obviously they are not happy together and the marriage has broken down. Divorce just unties an unwanted knot. I see no issue here.

Arguments like this make the anti-divorce lobby seem petty and insecure.

They both lost it!

Ironically, divorce has brought these two together.