Another time, Another John.

‘So-called ‘eurosceptics” is what I said – surely you understand that.

Kev, as opposed to an ‘establishment sceptic’ please describe a ‘eurosceptic’.

Amazing Silvio, ‘Looking on the positive side, The more they suffer the more they will appreciate their Liberty, when they acquire it.’…. I am speechless.

That’s actually not a bad prospect at all. We could have our Mediterranean version of the Bay of Pigs. We could join the rebels in a glorious amphibious landing in Tripoli.

PS. I must say that while posting my comment to Kev, I never realised that there was such a long queue before me. I would never have waited here.

Kev, let’s put it this way. Based on what Gaddafi (not the BBC) has said, why shouldn’t the US and Britain allow Gaddafi to kill a few more Al-Qaeda terrorists? The US and the UK never managed to kill anything close to “more than one thousand” Al-Qaeda terrorists in three weeks of fighting.

Mr. Secretary, there is space left in South America for discredited British Foreign Secretaries.

You can tell that this article in the constitution was written by a Maltese person. Because it is so fucking MUDDLED. We’re Maltese, let us confuse issues, yay!

The sheer mitna ta’ xejn panic jumps out at you in the words. Being a member of an alliance or not does not imply hosting or not hosting a foreign military base. And it does not define “base”. Non-alignment is not the same as neutrality. And so no and so forth.

They should just have said:

Malta will never be a NATO member, will actively work against NATO interests, and will pursue a policy of alignment with Libya, North Korea and China.

Three lines, and Bob’s your uncle.

Ah, a fellow Exiled reader. That was the best newspaper in the whole world. It’s lost some its spunk ever since they were kicked out of Russia but by god, I still f**king worship them.