<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: So they&#039;ve been advised against legalising bigamy, after all	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/</link>
	<description>Daphne Caruana Galizia is a journalist working in Malta.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:13:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Charlene		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlene]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 10:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=11531#comment-82364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82360&quot;&gt;Alan&lt;/a&gt;.

Same-sex couples have it difficult enough as it is, so if a new cohabitation law helps them get status and recognition we should go ahead with it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82360">Alan</a>.</p>
<p>Same-sex couples have it difficult enough as it is, so if a new cohabitation law helps them get status and recognition we should go ahead with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cogito		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cogito]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=11531#comment-82363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Alan, I cannot understand what you&#039;re proposing.  One can be either married or separated or divorced (single).  What separation means in our law is that the spouses remain married and retain all their obligations towards each other except that of living together - hence separation.

The obligations of reciprocal maintenance between spouses (unless excluded by agreement) and marital fidelity (which cannot be excluded even by agreement) remain unchanged.  It is therefore impossible to enact a law giving rights to cohabiting couples if at least one of the two is still married for there would be a breach of the fidelity obligation unless, that is, the obligation of marital fidelity in the case of separated couples is also removed by law.

This is the situation, pure and simple.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, I cannot understand what you&#8217;re proposing.  One can be either married or separated or divorced (single).  What separation means in our law is that the spouses remain married and retain all their obligations towards each other except that of living together &#8211; hence separation.</p>
<p>The obligations of reciprocal maintenance between spouses (unless excluded by agreement) and marital fidelity (which cannot be excluded even by agreement) remain unchanged.  It is therefore impossible to enact a law giving rights to cohabiting couples if at least one of the two is still married for there would be a breach of the fidelity obligation unless, that is, the obligation of marital fidelity in the case of separated couples is also removed by law.</p>
<p>This is the situation, pure and simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 13:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=11531#comment-82362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82361&quot;&gt;David&lt;/a&gt;.

100% correct.

They invented something new  in the process - &#039;nofs zwieg&#039;.

Strengthening the family indeed. LOL just doesn&#039;t cover it. It&#039;s more like 100 ROTFLMAOs.

Let&#039;s not fix the broken road, but shape the wheels to the pot-holes instead.

Malta is the laughing stock of the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82361">David</a>.</p>
<p>100% correct.</p>
<p>They invented something new  in the process &#8211; &#8216;nofs zwieg&#8217;.</p>
<p>Strengthening the family indeed. LOL just doesn&#8217;t cover it. It&#8217;s more like 100 ROTFLMAOs.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not fix the broken road, but shape the wheels to the pot-holes instead.</p>
<p>Malta is the laughing stock of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 11:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=11531#comment-82361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And I suspect the result of this will be that new heterosexual couples will be more inclined towards going for regularized cohabitation rather than marriage, in order to avoid finding themselves in such a complicated straitjacket.

What&#039;s more? Going into a cohabiting relationship will probably be relatively easy to get out of ... would this lead to the equivalent of a Las Vegas style divorce where one can just &quot;leave&quot; the relationship with little more than a few signatures in front of a notary? So much for the conservative 4-year period in the proposed law being a &#039;divorzju bla raguni&#039;!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I suspect the result of this will be that new heterosexual couples will be more inclined towards going for regularized cohabitation rather than marriage, in order to avoid finding themselves in such a complicated straitjacket.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more? Going into a cohabiting relationship will probably be relatively easy to get out of &#8230; would this lead to the equivalent of a Las Vegas style divorce where one can just &#8220;leave&#8221; the relationship with little more than a few signatures in front of a notary? So much for the conservative 4-year period in the proposed law being a &#8216;divorzju bla raguni&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 10:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=11531#comment-82360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with not including separated people in the cohabition law.

However, this legislation should have gone hand in hand with the introduction of divorce through a simple addition to the separation laws in our civil code, allowing separated people to remarry while still enforcing a separation contract, not through a referendum.

But we are in Malta, so viva the square wheel.

Same-sex couples will now have rights and legal recognition, before separated people who wish to have the same through remarriage.

Excuse me, but I must say this .... LOL]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with not including separated people in the cohabition law.</p>
<p>However, this legislation should have gone hand in hand with the introduction of divorce through a simple addition to the separation laws in our civil code, allowing separated people to remarry while still enforcing a separation contract, not through a referendum.</p>
<p>But we are in Malta, so viva the square wheel.</p>
<p>Same-sex couples will now have rights and legal recognition, before separated people who wish to have the same through remarriage.</p>
<p>Excuse me, but I must say this &#8230;. LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2011/05/so-theyve-been-advised-against-legalising-bigamy-after-all/#comment-82359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 10:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=11531#comment-82359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Read the full report here:


http://www.independent.com.mt/news.asp?newsitemid=125834]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the full report here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.com.mt/news.asp?newsitemid=125834" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.independent.com.mt/news.asp?newsitemid=125834</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 13/17 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: daphnecaruanagalizia.com @ 2026-04-22 12:29:33 by W3 Total Cache
-->