Comments on: Cyrus Engerer can't damage Labour's reputation because it's bad enough already

By: Esteve

Esteve — Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:33:00 +0000

A bit late for this particular post but I thought I’d post this link anyway:

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/media-ignores-couple-who-saved-40-in-norway-massacre-.html

By: Carmel Scicluna

Carmel Scicluna — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 14:50:40 +0000

[…] his desire for extreme revenge on both the prime minister and his wife have given the country divorce legislation.

Prosit! That’s a deep insight how our underground horned friend works his way!

By: fran

fran — Tue, 02 Aug 2011 10:17:53 +0000

His looks aren’t quite right and nor is what is between his ears. He is so pathetic. I love the way you show them up for what they are – wannabes.

By: l-ispettore d***ick

l-ispettore d***ick — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 16:14:23 +0000

This Cyrus saga stinks. Could it be that his abrupt deflection from his party was planned and timed in such a way that knowing that his GAMES were soon to emerge, he found the correct time to resign and create an image of a ‘miskin x’ghamlulu ghax mar mal-Labour.

By: Steve

Steve — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 13:52:42 +0000

Everybody keeps going on about the timing of the actual leak in relation to Cyrus leaving the PN, from the standpoint of him jumping ship THEN all hell breaking loose.

Has anyone considered that Cyrus jumped ship knowing the sh.t was about to hit the proverbial fan?

A lot of the heat for what he has allegedly done has been deflected by the questions about who leaked what, when and why.

If he was still within the PN and this news broke then all we’d be talking about is his (alleged) transgressions.

By: ciccio2011

ciccio2011 — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:14:44 +0000

In reply to John Vella. For once, Maltastar was spot on in its title. Cyrus Engerer will find that he will have to mature quickly if he plans to survive in politics within Labour.

By: Kenneth Cassar

Kenneth Cassar — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 12:07:43 +0000

In reply to Reuben Scicluna. @ H. P. Baxxter: In not less than 10,000 words?

By: Kenneth Cassar

Kenneth Cassar — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:52:49 +0000

In reply to Reuben Scicluna.

[Reuben Scicluna – Striving towards an end that appears good but which entails bad means to be achieved makes the whole endeavour bad].

I see. So according to Reuben, just because Jeffrey Pullicino Orlando used “bad means” to achieve divorce legislation must mean that “the whole endeavour” of obtaining divorce legislation is bad, because according to his “logic”, that tells us something about the “nature of things”.

So the question to Reuben is this: Is the whole endavour of converting people to Christianity intrinsically bad, just because of the Crusades and the Inquisition?

By: John Vella

John Vella — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:52:18 +0000

http://www.maltastar.com/pages/r1/ms10dart.asp?a=11847

By: H.P. Baxxter

H.P. Baxxter — Mon, 01 Aug 2011 10:02:23 +0000

In reply to Reuben Scicluna.

Is this is in the current Philosophy Intermediate paper then?

“You are in a gay relationship, and are quietly watching Al Jazeera when a video by Ayman Al-Zawahiri comes on. He is reported as saying that Al Qaeda will kill one thousand children unless you send photographs of your lover betraying you by having sex with his current lover. What should you do? Discuss the moral and philosophical implications of your decision in not less than 10000 words. Points will be deducted for mentioning kiwis.”