Comments on: As usual, Labour was after a headline, not correctness or the facts

By: ciccio2011

ciccio2011 — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:25:04 +0000

In reply to Jozef. Actually, this story about Joe Azzopardi having voted Labour in 1996 has been in circulation for some time. Why didn't Gino Cauchi ask for his removal, on that basis, before?

By: yor/malta

yor/malta — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:45:11 +0000

Daphne, should the PL win the next election at least be positive: you shall be given a ton (a tonne would be less ) to write about.

The only reason I vote PN is because the PL is so damned incompetent.

That party has a real chip on its shoulder and until that chip goes, it is damned to exist in a political limbo of its own making .

By: Chicken

Chicken — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:55:08 +0000

Din tal-Labour m’hi xejn hlief persekuzzjoni politika kontra il-gurnalisti involuti. Tal-Labour ma jinbidlu qatt. Anzi, iktar ma jinbidlu, iktar jibqghu l-istess – kif kien qal Evarist Bartolo.

By: Jozef

Jozef — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:24:30 +0000

Regarding

i….Lou didn’t.
ii…what policy and what party political debate?
iii…the first time they did, it regarded something about civil marriage.
iv…ditto.

So unless asking questions to the details of policy is equivalent to iii and iv, and the Nationalists are still miffed at his opinion on divorce, Lou’s square.

As for Peppi and his voting Labour, let’s give him another chance shall we?

To say we live in a fascist regime.