You can petition your MP to act on your behalf. Why not give it a try, Anton? Check how many votes elected your MP and collect the same number of signatures in your electoral district.

The point is she should never have heard the case because of her connection with the accused’s brother. There was clearly a conflict of interest in that case. Even though her judgement was underpinned by references to the law, her motivation is suspect.

Can the Chief Justice, the President of Chamber or the Attorney General look the other way? This is a serious matter that threatens the foundations of our democracy.

Daphne, I hope you pursue this case all the way until the magistrate resigns.

I bloody well hope so. Justice has to be seen to be done.

CORRECTION, LA REDOUTE:

“ruled in her lover’s brother’s favour whilst her husband was still in the dark about her having an extra-marital affair” is probably more like it.

VICTOR LAIVIERA, WHERE ARE YOU?

[Daphne – Parliament is for MPs, Anton, not petitioners. The idea is that you vote for a representative and stick him in parliament to represent you, hence no need for petitions. So the answer is….no, obviously.]

…wore a tiny denim skirt that made look like the back of a bus…apparently she took umbrage at the suggestion that she is not a spring chicken…I am not mocking your list but I am only pointing out that the Magistrate only objected to this description of her and nothing else. Makes one think that she does not have a good sense of judgement. All together now: really?