Er no. Labour unlike the Nationalist Party has been more clear about the issue without having to present a bill. You discuss these issues more clearly before you introduce bills.

And no the MGRM does not have any ‘agenda’, they are simply responding to political parties. Not to mention the fact that criticizing one party doesn’t mean you automatically support the other.

He is incredibly influential. And said anything, even something which doesn’t involve the word marriage but is still similar, i.e. civil unions, is dangerous and “wrong”.

Muscat; “We will also, out of conviction and not convenience introduce a civil union partnership for same sex couples”. Labour is more supportive of same-sex relationships. They are flawed in a million other ways, but I can’t see how you refuse to accept this concept.

Hinted? He’s flat out said he’s against gay marriage. What does that have to do with it?

Joseph Muscat hinted that he is against gay marriage.

By the same reasoning the rambling rants of Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici can be regarded as Labour policy. Now there’s an oxymoron.

Let’s first see a bill and then label it unclear, should the need arise. But calling a policy document “unclear” is, in my humblest of opinions, very premature and smacks of politicisation of an already sensitive issue.

Dan t’hawn fuq huwa ragunament ta’ bniedem t’Alla li kull wemmien jaqbel mieghu.

Id-dinja qed taghmel zball ohxon titkellem fuq id-drittijiet tal-bniedem u mhux fuq id-drittijiet t’Alla. Nispera li ma tindunax b’dan meta jkun tard wisq.

Or about the PN itself, just read something on today’s times. “The Malta Gay Rights Movement has said it is unimpressed by the PN’s “unclear” wording about homosexual rights.” Its very clear that PL would be more supportive some something like civil unions, especially when Adami says that tackling gay rights is “very dangerous” and a “big mistake”.

[Daphne – Eddie Fenech Adami does not run the Nationalist Party. The Labour Party has given no specific pledges on gay rights.]