It was an illogical argument.

She says the PN was her party of choice when Labour were doing their bit in the 80s.

When, according to her, the PN changed for the worse, she chooses Joseph’s Labour, restored 80s guard and all.

1981 was a legal administration with a functioning parliament according to Deborah/ Well, so were racial discrimination laws in 1931 Italy.

Sad seeing someone like her reduced to this.

She even asked us and wanted to know why there never was a motion against il-Guy during the eighties. What political immaturity of the first degree.

She thinks she can wriggle out of Labour’s glorious history with her lawyer reasoning. It won’t work with those of us who lived through the golden years.

It was equally hilarious but sad to watch Joe Gerada on One news justifying Muscat’s latest guarantee. A very fitting appreciation of the various Nationalist administrations, and especiallly Lawrence Gonzi, for giving him the opportunity and showing trust in him to lead one of the country’s major social agencies.

Becoming famous during the divorce referendum does not a politician make. It was hilarious listening to her try to justify why Labour governed in 1981.

[Daphne – Especially when she would have thought it unjustifiable before becoming a Labour candidate.]

It was even more hilarious listening to her trying to explain Labour’s new guarantee to youngsters when she was at the forefront of the student protests in 1997 with Deborah clearly seen holding a placard – Hands off our stipends.

She now wants us to believe that the same persons responsible for all the past Labour fracas from 1981 onwards and who are still prominent within Labour have changed and she now believes them and so should we. If she is so gullible, we are not.

A weak performance if I ever saw one. BIG FAIL