@Norwegian Wood
You are right. But I just wanted to avoid repeating myself about that one.

Eh, imma is-social cost jidhol biss meta naghmlu is-Sowxjal Impakt Assessmint, dak hemm, li qalilna Joseph.

Cicc, you forgot the repeater class.

So what?

L-aqwa li nkunu progressivi.

You should have added the social cost.

How many people had their dreams shattered?

How many people had to leave Malta as they could not stand a quasi dictatorship?

How many people ended up as waiters, operators, cleaners, labourers when they had the potential for so much more?

How many people were hurt by the l-Aristokrazija tal- Haddiema?

How many people lived a life deprived of the basics that fellow Europeans took for granted?

How much time, money and effort was lost in the Partnership vs Membership fight?

Mela dak mhux progress jew?

L-aqwa li ahna progressivi.

It is rumoured that, for the first time in ten centuries, the University of Oxford is considering conferring a DLitt (Hon Causa) to the entire PL leadership for their contribution to PPE over the years.

1. No to joining the EU.
2. No to joining the Euro.
3. No to liberalisation of trade.
4. No to privatisation.
5. No to university education for anyone who holds the right qualifications.
6. No to computer technology.
7. No to VAT.
8. No to the removal of subsidies.

1. Yes to fabbriki tal-kappar, korpi militari, korpi tal-pijunieri, dejma, Bahhar u Sewwi, Izra w Rabbi, Tarznari falluti.
2. Yes to 8,000 jobs with the public sector before the general elections of 1987.
3. Yes to barter and bulk buying.
4. Yes to CET.
5. Yes to Partnership – L-Aqwa Ghazla.
6. Yes to living wage.

An architect, an accountant and a bank clerk all vying for the top finance job?

And the only credible economist has lost all his neutrality by jumping to the red train?

The little twerp just keeps digging.

The people who are running the party now proved their competence in the 70s and 80s and also between 96 and 98.

Any further comment is superfluous.