Remarkable logic, La Redoute.

Download it for free from here:

http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.492594

Irrid nirrimarka ukoll li fl-ahhar tas-sena il-president kien jiffirma il-kotba tal-kaxxier. Wara li gara dan kollu ara ma tahsbux li irrezenja ma tarax anzi dahhal lis-successur tieghu DAVID biex ikompli ir-renju. Issa illum David Farrugia Sacco qieghad fuq is-super one jghallimna kif ghandha tintrefa ir-responsabilta ara vera irid ikollok wiccek u x’ imkien iehor xorta.

I think that given the gravity of the accusations and their implications, the Police should prioritize the clarifications to the public on the issue of these emails.

Surely an answer to the veracity and authenticity of the exchanges could be had well before the election date?

Given that there is a suspicion that the source of these forged emails could be linked to an intent to tamper with voter confidence, these findings merit a loud and clear answer to the public now and not after election date.

As it is, it appears that this blog is responsible for and capable of publicly raising concerns, responding to and perhaps clearing certain issues faster than the original sources of publication of these mails.

Though the whole of the case may well require lengthier treatment, I believe there is a moral obligation that the Police should now observe in coming forward with an urgent statement as to this particular aspect, as well as a loud and clear reporting of this statement by all media.

Even if it is to state that the emails in question are not included in their inquiry.

Well done Daphne.

Yes Jozef, in living colour nonetheless.
We saw him, he said it.

Interesting, although I think that misspelling ‘informe’ is just a coincidence.

Lynn Zahra’s comment contains many other errors such as, ‘ would you belief it?’, 3policemen, i.dcard, etc.

In the case of ‘informe’, notice which word follows – ‘me’. It is easy, especially when in a hurry to duplicate letters or be thinking one syllable ahead. She wrote…’informe me’, probably with her mind set on ‘me’ and repeating it twice.

In my opinion, Gino Cauchi’s body language betrayed a guilty conscience.

While Austin Gatt was speaking to him, he constantly looked straight into his eyes. Gino, on the otherhand, could not look at Austin and either looked downwards or turned his gaze elsewhere.

Tal-Labour ilhom jaghmlu allegazzjonjiet dwar dan il-Ministru li huwa Ministru korrot, u qatt ma’ gabu provi u dejjem hargu ta’ mazetta.

Allura xi hadd qieghed jipprova jdahhlu fi xkora u jkun xieraq li l-Pulizija tagixxi b’moghd serju u responsabbli sabiex iz-zejt jitla’ f’wicc l’ilma darba ghal dejjem u l-poplu isir jaf ezatt min hu korrot jew le.

Il-Laboristi, mill-kbir saz-zghir, kollha jghidu li Austin Gatt huwa korrot meta dan il-bniedem qatt ma’ rrizulta li kien involut f’xi tip ta’ korruzzjoni u mhux sew li titfa stigma fuq bniedem meta jkun innocenti ghax dan huwa kas ta’ ksur tal-ligi serju, u ta’ dawn l’allegazzjonijiet hadd m’hu responsabbli hlief il-Partit Laburista imexxi minn Jioseph Muscat.

Forsi issa johrog Joseph Muscat u jghidilna li il-Prim Ministru cempel lill-Pulizija biex jaghlqu ghajnejhom dwar dan il-kaz ukoll bhal ma rrisponda dwar il-kaz ta; Toni Abela.

If you can forge a smile, a movement, and a roadmap, you can forge many emails.

I agree perfectly with this view. They are trying to distract him from the electoral strategy.

What I could not understand was the behaviour of Gino Cauchi on TVHemm this evening. He was all the time acting like an idiot. You don’t go to TVHemm to face Austin Gatt and keep making gestures like an idiot.