I will be honest and say that after a long day of work I needed to read this three times to understand it, but when I did, my word is it thought-provoking.

The same applies to many heads of NGO’s such as those whose stated aim is to tackle racism when they themselves, and their very appointment is racist.

[Daphne – Tsk tsk.]

No, Rumplestiltskin I disagree.

Precisely because her logic is impeccable and transparent I’m sure it will be understood by anyone whose mind is not blinded by party allegiance. I consider many (if not all) of the so-called switchers are in such a category.

To them I can add a number of ‘traditional’ Labour voters. The problem now is whether all these people will admit to themselves (if not to others) that Labour was not the better choice.

I think they will continue to give them ‘another try’ until they themselves (or those close to them) eventually get the sting of (the consequences) of the bad decisions and policies being adopted.

A perfectly reasoned answer!

The choice of appointee is an equally perfect and shining example of Labour’s myopic hypocrisy. Gabi Calleja was a strong choice for such an appointment (in terms of intellectual and moral integrity as well as on grounds of gender opportunity).

But in Labour’s blatantly partisan and myopic view, party allegiance and commitment is paramount over all other considerations.

This blog’s consistent unmasking of Labour’s true colours is unparalleled.

I think Gabi Calleja would do a much better job than Cyrus Engerer.

M’hemmx x’ taghmel.Riedu wiehed in charge, li hu ragel fuq l-irgiel.

a person committing a crime against his partner (sic) leading a government consultative council; an alleged fraudster (Claudette Baldacchino) vying for a post at the European Parliament as an MEP; an ex police superintendent who is well known for his partisan views and for his heavy handed attitude vis a vis suspects under police custody appointed as a Police COmmissioner … what’s next?