Comments on: Michael Briguglio to step down as AD chairman.

By: H.P. Baxxter

H.P. Baxxter — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 14:58:16 +0000

In reply to Jozef. Who, Edward Mallia?

By: mattie

mattie — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:50:25 +0000

Nahseb ahjar nintefa nidhak. Xeba jdur ma’ kull rih.

By: H.P. Baxxter

H.P. Baxxter — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:29:07 +0000

As pro bono consultant to the Labour administration, here is the “Action to be taken”.

Briguglio is a professional in the field of sociology, with a solid experience in environmental lobbying. The government should appoint him to the upcoming reorganised MEPA, MCESD, or a Commission for Social Equality (does it exist? If not, set it up pronto!).

He should be given an executive post. Perhaps CEO.

This will be a PR coup for Labour, which will be seen to be opening itself to outsiders (Briguglio comes from AD, not Labour), to be concerned about Green issues, and to rewarding professional merit.

This should result in an immediate rise in approval ratings.

Will that do?

Report produced on 2 April 2013 by Baxx2Baxx Consulting Inc.

By: Manuel

Manuel — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 08:23:12 +0000

It was just a matter of time. Mikey is in. He will eventually join the PL.

Remember how happy he was when Varist suggested a national threshold so that AD can have a seat in Parliament? He is so naive that he did not realise that Varist proposed this because he and his party has a comfy majority in Parliament. He would not have suggested the threshold if the PL had only a one-seat majority. Ovvja.

Besides, what Bartolo suggested, and the way he suggested it, was only to cover his hate and repulsion towards the PN. Having AD in Parliament is a means, by Varist’s standards, to get back at the PN.

Michael is so pro-PL that he did not read between the lines. He now believes that the only way to have a seat in Parliament is to join the PL – his natural home.

By: jojo

jojo — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 06:27:55 +0000

Mhux hekk? The squeaky clean Briguglio wants a slice of the Labour pie.

By: Jozef

Jozef — Tue, 02 Apr 2013 00:28:14 +0000

In reply to Dott Abjad.

The Green movement is solely responsible for the worst chapter in the history of technological evolution known to mankind.

They subdued science into a dogma, enforcing an impossible ideology onto research, wasted decades on ridiculous ‘ecological’ experiments, bio-fuels, wind energy, afforestation disasters, ‘conservation’ blunders and finally, and this is what makes them, to me, insufferable, distorted the meaning of style.

Mallia, one of their fabled evergreens, thinks Malta Drydocks should return.

Bring back Aquinas.

By: Dott Abjad

Dott Abjad — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 23:32:42 +0000

In reply to Ghoxrin Punt. To Ghoxrin Punt: Too true!

By: Dott Abjad

Dott Abjad — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 23:31:30 +0000

In reply to Ghoxrin Punt.

To Baxxter: http://www.facebook.com/PopulationMatters

Agree with you fully!

By: Alexis

Alexis — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:08:53 +0000

In reply to maryanne. To help the Labour Party win and push the P.N. to the opposition benches, obviously.

By: Ghoxrin Punt

Ghoxrin Punt — Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:05:11 +0000

In reply to Dott Abjad.

Dott Abjad, it is too late for AD to go back to being a pressure group. They lost the one person who actually spoke Green like he believed it.

All they have had over the last decade are a bunch of losers who try to play with the big boys but fail miserably purley because they are amateurs and incompetent ones to boot.

Their colour clearly came out in these elections and guess what it ain’t Green.