I wish to be a fly on the wall when that happens

Whether the PM has or hasn’t, he’s probably having the laugh of his life positioning puppets there at his whim. All such people in temporary positions of power and influence commit the basic error of thinking that they’re accountable to no one.

They forget to zoom in on the relevance of time and plans of fortune, or impact of random events, as the unknown element.

In addition to what is already known.

From now on it’s a balancing act, if the rope holds. Photoshop and background mentors can do so much.

@Mandy – my late mother would have said, ghandu intern hazin – il-hdura li ghandu gewwa tidher f’wiccu, and in this case, I would have to agree with her 100%.

I think he is very, very evil.

Where did he say this, on his idiotic rave-fest he calls a blog? I couldn’t find it. Will he now claim that he:

A) Never actually wrote it
B) Can’t remember having wrote it
C) His blog has been tampered with as, although people saw it there he did not write it himself

High achiever? No, LOW-LIFE!

Very good ideas. The more exposure, the better. The same for Joseph’s U-turns please. Put it all into context. Date it. Print it. Expose it. Sell it.

Get it on easily accessible record.

[Daphne – Daph, bl-‘a’. Hoss kompletament differenti fl-Ingliz milli fil-Malti.]

Because perhaps as a Christian you believe that the good in the person will find a way to emerge? and you are willing to give that person sufficient time to prove himself.

Because even though legal systems exist, for some valid ethical reason or another, it is not everyone that chooses that route?

Because people are meant to be responsible in their choices. Is there a law controlling the ethical day to day behaviour of those in Government? Sometimes things are a ‘gentle’ accumulation of offences and every step of the way the elements change.

I have full respect for Dr Gonzi. Adults are not meant to behave like Franco Debono does, and facing this type of manipulative comportment seeking to satisfy a little masked duplicity, which would have been a progressive assault is a test of endurance in itself. The police, in any case, only look at cut and clean situations.

Police reports too would rely on an investigation the methods for which are perhaps not too equipped for investigating psychological harassment, mobbing and isolation tactics emanating from quarters that are supposedly upper white collar, and where the input is progressively incremental.

To have Franco in charge of amendments to the types of situation he manipulated to the extent he did is the ultimate irony from Joseph, consequently unveiled as the mob master.

Does the law cover this sort of situation? Does it now fit in under acceptable political tactics? Have the parametres shifted permitting all sorts of unethical actions? Psychological harassment involves a new breed of actions to take into account, by a very white collar crowd, and the law may not have been designed to cover the full extent of this specifically. Who protects those who do not fall under unions? who are not in a employer/ employee relationship? Who is there within the Police force that is qualified to understand the ramifications of one action after another? and the consequential finesse in the build-up?

Dr Gonzi might have had to deal with all sorts of technical inadequacies. There is a first time for everything.