Comments on: This is the crucial bit of information that Saviour Balzan duplicitously failed to report: HE asked to have Taliana investigated

By: Jon

Jon — Mon, 26 Aug 2013 06:40:10 +0000

Saviour Balzan had published an article about the arson attacks. The article included a picture of burning tyres and hinted that Norman Lowell and/or the people around him were responsible.

By: Dissident

Dissident — Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:14:32 +0000

He thinks he is some kind of Marco Travaglio with this videblog

By: Simon

Simon — Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:53:38 +0000

I cannot understand why a nice man like Roger puts up with Saviour and his tantrums and obsessions.

And can someone please tell Saviour (who has a face for radio) to stick to the written or spoken word.

Those video blogs are dreadful.

By: Betty

Betty — Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:31:28 +0000

Whoever is capable of acting professionally should be congratulated not attacked because of personal Lanzit. Taliana showed his peers how the investigation should have been conducted to get the proper legal and just result. So it is somebody else who needs to pull up his socks including the lackey Police Commissioner.

Saviour Balzan loses control when he comes across some incident that involves a common personal enemy, Gonzi, RCC, now Taliana. So spare your newspaper another scum campaign, Balzan. You are really becoming Gurnalista taz-Zuffjett.

By: curious

curious — Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:08:29 +0000

“Irrispettivament mill-ezitu tal-Qorti se nippruvaw il-fatti.” Dangerous.