No mention of the good governance of the ‘gvern preċedenti’?

Corner Labour and expose the paradox for what it is.

Muscat’s campaign was contradictory when it came to key issues like transportation, energy and the environment.

Malta cannot avoid or hush these and expect industry, tourism or investment to flourish.

Corruption, moral or material and approximative reasoning carry limits. Something Labour cherishes, feeding off exploitation.

By stepping up, not just challenging the state of affairs, but actively taking over policy, the intellectually stunted should react, uncovering the limits.

It’s not the PN’s remit to subscribe, it’s more an obligation to intercept and understand. Form is meaning, the way Labour encourages its perverse lowest denominator to abuse has to be counteracted by one which provides a correct alternative.

A very fine line indeed. But Malta’s fragility demands the risk.

Otherwise, any idea to compromise will produce political facadism, just like those ridiculous town houses crowned with unimaginative concrete and everyone’s expected to be happy.

We’ve seen it, everyone rushing in to ‘help’ Joseph, lest the plebiscite reflects badly, or, and this is why it won’t work, keep away from the PN to avoid contaminating the movement.

It’s that perverse. And unsustainable, as if this self-imposed detente can last five years. There’s so many Kenneth Zammit Tabona’s around.

The PN needs semiotics. Subject matter available.

We are waiting for some comments from Europe regarding the extreme nepotism that we are seeing here.

Can we also have some changes to the design of our Identity Malta super agency?