@ It-tezi ta’Malta

Yes. If he was a proper thinker he wouldn’t sabotage his own projects, and his operation would run under one serious brand, not under several little semi-autonomous questionable labels, like the variations to Nair’s name.

Turns out she’s been right all along.

Again.

Yes. That is why the counter-exposure had to take place as it did.

I never liked the man. Always seemed to me to be stating the obvious and then looking delighted with himself for doing so.

He actually confused me when I was younger until I realised that if you act like you’ve discovered something fantastic, people will instinctively play along. It’s a magician’s (and our Joey’s) way of things.

de Bono is not a thinker. He is a marketing man. That is what he sells, and that is how he sells it.

And that is how Muscat and his Taghna Lkoll religion were sold.

These things are not always available to the world for inspection on a plate. The important factor relevant to Malta at the moment is that these tools have purposely been used in a negative context, with negative intentions and negative objectives by the Labour Party

There is but one part to Edward de Bono: the salesman.

Just because he’s a billionaire doesn’t mean he’s a genius. A genius brings new understanding to the world.

[Daphne – I’m afraid it’s not a story, but reality. You shouldn’t be watching it unfold with the enthusiasm of somebody seeking to be entertained, because we are going to have to live with this.]