If they expressly said they wouldn’t effect any changes that would negatively impact the Financial Services sector, is there a mandate for changes that do precisely that?

Equally worrying is their sheer oblivion that what they sow today will eventually annihilate us all, themselves included.

Yes fine, but I’m not talking about promising something and then not delivering it.

I’m talking about letting people believe that things will be done in one way, and then going about it in a way that doesn’t even resemble what people thought it would be like.

L-injoranza u l-inkapaċita’ biex imexxu u l-għira u l-ħdura li għandhom lejn in-Nazzjonalisti.

If previously it was solely in the “home affairs” box as quoted in the Chamber of Advocates communication, it is now half in one box and half in another. It would be a delusion to insist that it is being treated as remaining in that one box. It may be wishful thinking, but the shift in treatment is there, has almost happened, and right now would be the time to seek clarification in accordance with EU principles and directives. This, in addition to any future actions possible.

What is it now therefore?

————

Is this the new form of voter boundary shifter?

It may be legal, but it is not morally right.

In 1996, soon after they were elected to government, Labour lost their “boxxla socjali”.

Now, they have lost their “boxxla morali.”

”The end justifies the means” and that includes being economical with the truth about one’s real intentions without actually committing the sin of blatant lying.

Selling passports to the highest bidder or what is left of Malta’s open spaces will do little to help put food on the table, create jobs, improve the health services, make the fixed wage last till the end of the month or redress the ‘injustices’ to the little man as promised in the PL electoral manifesto.

In four years’ time it will be owned by fraudsters.