Comments on: So what is Fly Away Peter Fly Away Paul going to do about it?

By: charlie14357

charlie14357 — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 22:06:43 +0000

Daphne what is your email please

By: Galahan II

Galahan II — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 21:47:32 +0000

You don’t know the half of it.

At least some masons are not ashamed to say they are masons up-front.

There is a whole other subculture in Malta of businessmen who hang out together under cover of religious-based communities.

They call each other “brothers”, have a token priest on board, continuously “Praise God” (but still do what needs to be done in the world of business no matter how double-standard this is) and of course are committed to “help each other out” when the going gets tough.

The initiation ceremony involves organising a dinner at your home for selected brothers who will judge your “worthiness” to join.

I cannot be more specific here for various reasons.. but truly Mafia is well and alive here under many guises.

By: Victor

Victor — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 20:26:41 +0000

In reply to Joe Fenech. Good question Joe. After all most of us know for a fact that one of the rules of Freemasons is to look after each other. In fact that is the main reason why it is dangerous to have a Freemason as a Judge or Magistrate in a Court of Law.

By: Glenn

Glenn — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 19:16:10 +0000

In reply to botom.

Resign, Pietru Pawl Zammit. Mintiex denn li tilbes uniformi ta’ pulizija ahseb u ara ta’ Kummissarju. It-torca li tilbes harqitek!

Wiehed kien bhalek u qablek u taf kif spicca hux. Abbuza mill-poter u spicca l-habs.

By: Makjavel

Makjavel — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 18:49:18 +0000

The ridiculous fact is that a magistrate should not be a member of a club, football club organisation , a most recent case.

But then there is no problem for a magistrate being a member of a secret society call it club, if you want.

Because free masonery is powerful enough to take charge of big organisations and nations.

By: Kevin Zammit

Kevin Zammit — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:19:52 +0000

Don’t we all know the answer? Pity the Labour fools can’t read and think.

By: chico

chico — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 15:40:20 +0000

Can some one please tell me why Peralta was not, if not arrested, at least ordered to leave the public building where he was caught smoking? Police chicken kienu u chicken ghadhom.

By: David

David — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 13:21:31 +0000

The police were acting on orders from a magistrate. Thus the magistrate is ultimately responsible for the arrest.

By: Francis Saliba M.D.

Francis Saliba M.D. — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:55:09 +0000

According to evidence available up to now, the police from Commissioner down to constable, can do now wrong if it is in aid of the Labour Party and its favourites.

According to the incumbent Police Commissioner the Force is brought into disrepute if a member of the police force, in the execution of his duty to prevent crime and to bring (the correct) culprit to justice, he fails to obtain the prior blessing of the Commissioner.

We now have a case of policemen arresting a journalist not on his own authority or on an order from his superior officer but on the order of an off-duty magistrate partying inside the precincts of his hall inside the law courts.

What a disgraceful shambles.

By: Jozef

Jozef — Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:48:23 +0000

In reply to Joe Fenech.

http://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2013-12-21/news/silvio-scerri-appointed-to-petitions-board-3508371459/