Comments on: Are we really supposed to believe that was a mistake? Even that is no excuse: a government which publishes a short legal notice without checking it is beyond incompetent

By: Confused

Confused — Fri, 07 Feb 2014 20:52:38 +0000

http://www.arabianbusiness.com//for-sale-eu-passports-537637.html

By: verita

verita — Fri, 07 Feb 2014 19:39:34 +0000

Don’t these people know their numbers yet? They mixed up 5 and 3 and the police commissioner mixed up 6 with 7 assistant commissioners.Go back to Sant’s repeater class

By: Josette

Josette — Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:50:52 +0000

In reply to drewsome. I think they tried to pull a fast one hoping that the MPs who bothered to read the legal notice would just read the English version. There have been other cases of such discrepancies (although these were genuine mistakes) in the past which went unnoticed for a number of years but they never regarded such important aspects of a legal notice,

By: Evarist Saliba

Evarist Saliba — Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:20:31 +0000

Was the EU Commission presented with both versions of the government legal notice?

By: Joseph

Joseph — Thu, 06 Feb 2014 22:15:50 +0000

That’s because everything is done with haste to get the money rolling, too bad we are the ones to pay the price.

By: Ghoxrin Punt

Ghoxrin Punt — Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:47:07 +0000

Given the fact that they had to issue a press release on the appointment of six, no seven, no six, no seven, new superintendent, bla,bla,bla, in the police force 3 times, I will actually give them the benefit of the doubt on this one.

Having said that, given that labourintes are going to misunderstand what I am trying to say, because they are stupid….. THIS IS NOT A COMPLIMENT, IT DOES NOT MEAN I ACCEPT IT, IT DOES NOT MEAN IT IS OK….IT JUST MEANS YOU ARE INCOMPETENT AND NOT FIT TO GOVERN

By: Neo

Neo — Thu, 06 Feb 2014 21:10:50 +0000

It is even worse because the government was warned in advance that the legal notice would be under scrutiny. That should have been enough to make them carry out at least a double check before publication.

But we cannot expect any better, can we?

By: Harry Purdie

Harry Purdie — Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:36:16 +0000

In reply to edgar. Good thing that we will never have to run a war. Automatic defeat.

By: drewsome

drewsome — Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:36:13 +0000

Bloody amateurs, lurching from one screw-up to the next.

By: Allo Allo

Allo Allo — Thu, 06 Feb 2014 20:00:11 +0000

They can’t even do a due diligence exercise in the proof reading let alone in the applicant screening process. Nistghu inserrhu rasna.