Comments on: So who exactly was Jesmond Mugliett working for?

By: H.P. Baxxter

H.P. Baxxter — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:18:05 +0000

In reply to matt. Because the PN is still made up largely of twunts.

By: Coronado

Coronado — Wed, 26 Feb 2014 11:28:26 +0000

In reply to matt. The special concrete used by the Taiwanese engineers in the late sixties only needed to be repaired in places, so much so, that under Mugliett's watch they had to get special cutting apparatus at great extra cost over tender. After all, Regional Road was and still is two lanes up/two lanes down. In fact this bridge never needed to be rebuilt at such great cost, obviously going over tendered amount. Snouts at the trough?

By: etil

etil — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:20:56 +0000

Anyone wants to bet we will be getting the ‘old’ drivers back in the ‘new’public transport system ?

By: mattie

mattie — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:11:52 +0000

People degreed in Domestic Science bla bla and bla are also called doctors nowadays.

By: matt

matt — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 13:33:34 +0000

This is the question- After the bad handling of that bridge project why was this Mugliett allowed to stand on the PN ticket?

By: Botom

Botom — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:52:34 +0000

When McGill’s met their potential Maltese partners, mainly the leading bus owners, they suggested that 50% of the profits would go to McGill’s, 40% to the Maltese partners and the other 10% to the special Maltese adviser.

The Maltese counterparts who were present for this meeting understood that the 10% would go to Mr Mugliett.

By: watchful eye

watchful eye — Tue, 25 Feb 2014 11:37:14 +0000

Exactly my thoughts. What role did this ex PN minister responsible for this sector play in this latest public transport saga? Would love a plausible reply.