There are a lot of pictures on Facebook some much more disturbing than this. Parents are responsible for what their children have access to and no one else.

With a laptop and internet access any child has direct access to the most twisted pornography a long with any mature film or music ever created. Should all art forms that are inappropriate for children be banned then? Or just kept off Facebook?

I see much more sense in not allowing 13-year-olds unsupervised internet access but that’s just me.

What is wrong with this picture and other similar ones is that they are plastered on Facebook.

Let’s not forget there are children as young as thirteen who have access to them.

If consenting adults pay to have degrading pictures taken, it’s self-immolation, not art. If photographers provide a service against payment, it’s business, not art.

Prostitutes provide services against payment too. Some of their services are more degrading than others, and some of them provide those services even when other options are available to them. But it’s prostitution, not art.

This is much the norm, that we have a minister who is a regular customer of pole-dancing and gentlemen’s clubs that might be a front for white slavery.

Well done Daphne, so true !

I can perhaps understand a man’s reason for behaving in this manner but cannot fathom why women are stupid enough not to realise they have become part of a widespread disease where women are in the constant need of ego-massaging only to become putty in the hands of repugnant men.

They are not modelling, they are modelling clay.

Like gay adoption

This is actually a fetish some men have. They actually get it from, where else, pornography which is known as ‘abuse porn’.

So now a woman posing as ‘abused’ with make-up smeared on her face is ‘sexy’ art.