Aha, and who got their lodges all mixed up then?

There’s this war going on, a splinter group growing and moving away from any recognised rite.

Perhaps Lino Spiteri could answer that question?

A reminder that he’s the boss.

To have chosen Chambray at the same time that he wants to be “liberal” on the subject of drug use is a concern that sets bells ringing.

The questions as to money laundering and Muscat’s real interest in the research required for that book are also a concern. A book is not the lazy way out he would normally opt for. Why have a book do the job that he could have exposed enough information on as Editor of Maltastar.com or in any other of the Labour Press outlets for information?

Muscat was then “member of the National Commission for Fiscal Morality (1997–98).” Fiscal morality is hardly what can be called a defining point for either the Labour Party, or Muscat’s Government.

Something stinks.

One wonders if Alfred Sant is also being reminded of allegiances and promises in this senseless and hypocritical MEP candidature. This is not what stinks.

——–

“The court noted that Muscat`s own testimony had shown that he was motivated to include plaintiff in his publication in order to pay her back for some of her writings.”

A behavioural pattern to underline.

Norman Vella, and eventually others, will be able to cite this case when establishing behavioural pattern.

Any analyst about who could shed light on the matter please?

Is this the attitude to the bullied teenage school boy or is it the bully`s himself?

If only Joe could clarify this point.

Wow – is that a bomb waiting to explode – or are you just asking ?

Hdura. We’ve been seeing manifestations of this spiteful character trait since the first week of Labour government.

What a far cry from the clean, ‘nice’ , pleasant image of him portrayed during the electoral campaign.

Muscat really managed to fool thousands of people who are probably feeling pretty sheepish for allowing themselves to be deceived big time.

If this question would be put to Muscat and, as he normally does, would not answer to questions put to him, and if one were to use the same line of inference he wanted to imply regarding DCG, would he be a member of P2?

Ask him whether he considers Freemasonry to be a corrupt and shady secret society. If he gives a downright affirmative answer than he’s not one of them, if on the other hand he tries to be evasive then he’s in.

I think he will beat around the bush and will avoid answering the tricky question.

Freemasons can lie to you about their membership but they cannot denounce their society; that would be considered as treason by the brotherhood.