I do see an interconnector there between the Chinese way of doing things and Labour`s way of pronouncing “Not in the interest of the nation to know”.

I am. I am violently opposed to Chinese culture.

Ignoring that for business is one thing, but going all out to state that the foundation of a ‘just and fair society’ is dependent on China’s aims as expressed by its government is quite another.

‘…..Against a backdrop of rapid socio-economic change and modernization, China continues to be an authoritarian one-party state that imposes sharp curbs on freedom of expression, association, and religion; openly rejects judicial independence and press freedom; and arbitrarily restricts and suppresses human rights defenders and organizations, often through extra-judicial measures.

The government also censors the internet; maintains highly repressive policies in ethnic minority areas such as Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia; systematically condones—with rare exceptions—abuses of power in the name of “social stability” ; and rejects domestic and international scrutiny of its human rights record as attempts to destabilize and impose “Western values” on the country. The security apparatus—hostile to liberalization and legal reform—seems to have steadily increased its power since the 2008 Beijing Olympics. China’s “social stability maintenance” expenses are now larger than its defense budget…..’

The moment I googled ‘human rights in China’ the browser was flooded with China friendly ‘news’.

What’s worrying is the paragraph dealing with China’s methods, call it investment, to penetrate and subdue African countries.

That ”small”detail does not seem to bother the British government or Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth during last week’s visit of the Chinese delegation for some lucrative business deals.

Do you honestly think she does?

http://www.chrdnet.com/2014/06/china-reverse-travesty-of-justice-free-persecuted-human-rights-defenders-in-jiangxi/