Do you think they put a whole lot of fog into every argument, editors and all, thinking the house will disappear from sight if the Minister is determined to stay?

Is she one of those Maltese who won’t let the sunlight through her bedroom window for fear of it attacking the antiques?

I highly doubt that.

I’m so tired of the attempts at mind-bending.

If they would all just do the decent thing and go.

Such a sham set-up from whichever point it’s analysed.

”€3 million in benefits saved as payment to abusers stopped – minister”

‘Saved’ implies a done deal, but in the artilcle it says ‘is being saved’ but does not specify over which period.

”The country is saving more than €3 million in benefit payments after it stopped paying 724 abusers , Social Solidarity Minister Michael Farrugia said this morning.”

The article states ”Farrugia said that more people were being investigated.”

‘More’ as in ‘more than before or a certain number’ or it meant to say ‘more WILL BE investigated’.

The article goes on to state ”He (Farrugia) also spoke on the EU food scheme and said this was currently in the tender process and would be implemented in the beginning of the year.” It does not answer the question many have been asking regarding why EU food distribution had been stopped, nor does it acknowledge the fact that where supplies are dependent on tenders, the said tenders are sorted so as not to disrupt supply.

The article does end with a loaded quip in line with what we have come to expect from this government, conveniently not substantiated.

”The government, he said, would not allow abuse even on the food being donated by the EU”

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20141127/local/3-million-in-benefits-saved-as-payment-to-abusers-stopped-minister.545889

Please watch this video again, especially at 1.37 when the Speaker talks about corruption. Prophetic stuff! Look who shows up at that exact moment.

Later on in his speech, the Speaker lauds Muscat for not tolerating “dawk li jaqbzu l-linja”. Alas, Muscat is still dithering on this one.

One assumes that she, as one half of the couple, benefits from profits made from this company.

Since, as far as we know, she has not divorced or is not legally separated from her husband, her argument falls flat.

Some on the contrary insist on putting their foot so deeply into their mouth that the oxygen supply to their brain is cut off.

”…Dr Dalli said she had listed Pada Builders in her ministerial declaration of assets only because it formed part of the community of acquests with her husband. She had no shareholding in the company, nor was she a director. She had no responsibility and no say in the way it was run.”

I thought that Helena Dalli was a lawyer. Did she not attend class when ‘community of acquests’ was being discussed?

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20141127/local/helena-dalli-demands-political-responsibility-for-lies-said-against-her.545800

Labour, the government all in for the perks but none of the responsibilities.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2009748/That-bridge-far-Worlds-longest-sea-bridge-opens-traffic-China–hold-title-years.html

Is that the definition of orgy?

Allura il-fatt li John Cassar White, dejjem skond Bonello, l-ewwel qal li se jmur ghal-arbitragg, imbaghad biddel hsiebu, x’inhuwa:

(a) “dilettantizmu”;

(b) “inkompetenza”;

(c) “korruzzjoni”;

(d) “decizjonijiet li jittiehdu fl-interess tal-ftit kontra l-interess tal-hafna”?

Bonello jattakka lil Cassar White talli dan, qabel l-elezzjoni, kien ikkritika lil BOV. Allura lil Bonello x’irid jinghadlu, wara li tant fahhar lil Labour qabel l-elezzjoni?

Well done, Simon – I have great respect for you and I know you will lead us to victory and rid us of these dishonest power-hungry philistines.