Comments on: Why is the Labour Party so obsessed with sex? It’s been this way as long as I remember.

By: silvio Farrugia

silvio Farrugia — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 20:08:55 +0000

They are all so uncouth

By: H.P. Baxxter

H.P. Baxxter — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:18:08 +0000

It’s not just about its obsession with sex. Labour is in touch with man’s erotic aspirations as per its original leftist/socialist and later liberation struggle/postcolonial ideology. Vide Gensna, as well as a slew of “awturi Maltin” novels, where class hatred is framed in the context of sexual tension.

Which is exactly why Malta is in the crapper. After Strickland, it’s never had a proper Liberal Right.

By: winston psaila

winston psaila — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 09:02:34 +0000

It’s because screwing is in their nature, both physically and metaphorically. I don’t mind them doing it physically; good luck to them. It’s when they metaphorically screw us in each and every way possible that irritates me.

By: ciccio

ciccio — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:22:54 +0000

In reply to Salvu. Don Manwel Mallia is conspicious by his absence in that gathering, too. I agree with your comment about Bartolo attempting to position himself as the alternative centre forward, although he scored an auto-goal soon afterwards.

By: Tabatha White

Tabatha White — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 07:00:30 +0000

In reply to ciccio. At first the last word seemed the most applicable, but they do go so well together. A visual encompassing the vital stats.

By: Salvu

Salvu — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:59:37 +0000

http://www.tvm.com.mt/news/aggornat-qatt-ma-niddejjaq-niddeciedi-ghal-dak-li-hu-sewwa-u-l-ahjar/

Interesting to note that the labour MPs listed by Simon Busuttil in his budget speech are nowhere to be seen in that Labour gathering . No Lucianos, Silvios and Buhagiars.

On the other hand, a week after the budget, the Minister of Finance is hidden behind Godfrey Farrugia and Evarist Bartolo.

Chris Said quoted Evarist Bartolo as saying that “the prime minister’s role is not that of goalkeeper (dejjem jaqla’ go fih) but of a centre forward”. In the circumstances, that has only one explanation: there is big trouble within the Labour team formation and Evarist is proposing himself as the alternative centre forward.

He wanted to make an impact on the Labour core supporters. He probably even managed to do so.

By: decimus

decimus — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:29:20 +0000

These words are being uttered by a member of a party which spent 25 years struggling to stitch back its hymen, only to lose it again in less than 20 months.

Not only stitch back its hymen, but also do a facelift and other extensive cosmetic interventions. And yes, the people fell for it and believed that the PL, the former MLP, was again a virgin.

By: Carl Savage

Carl Savage — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 06:22:09 +0000

Purcinell. Shouldn’t Varist and Labour be more concerned about infundibuliform anus restoration surgery? Jew ghadhom ma xebghux jiehduh f’sor….

By: Tabatha White

Tabatha White — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 05:41:28 +0000

The only way a Labour audience can follow a sentence from start to finish is if it includes, sex, violence, drugs or rewards from greed.

It’s otherwise challenged.

Wittingly and unwittingly, their production of entertainment is based on this principle.

As a result of their targeted attack on schools last time round, we can now be certain that at least half their ranks find it difficult to follow a film in English anyway.

By: denis

denis — Mon, 01 Dec 2014 02:41:14 +0000

In reply to etil. They most probably applaud him Etil.