This is 2014 not the century of the Crusades. Why try to bring the mountain to Mohammed when Mohammed was nowhere to be seen.

If the collision had been in a forward motion of a moving vehicle would the mirror not be folding over in a forward position?

The mirror seems to have been damaged from the front backward hanging towards the back. Seems that even the damage was staged. I put nothing past them.

Ah, but would witnesses dare come forward?

Ghadek iblah?

Ahemm, not everyone failed to focus on the absence of damage on the Insignia.

http://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2014/11/look-at-the-commotion-youd-think-the-british-man-had-shot-at-manuel-mallias-driver/

C.Falzon, yes fine, but how do you explain the mirror’s top part virtually smashed beyond recognition yet the structural bottom section still fully extended on its mount?

Mirrors are designed to break off their mount entirely if the impact was that hard.

Why is Mr. Smith refusing to speak to the media?

Why is Mr. Sheehan still running about?

Are there any witnesses who filmed the incident on their mobile?

Because our mirror was suddenly hyper-extended and the impact was on the mirror area, rather than the housing of the mirror, it broke.

The other car’s mirror was snapped closed not hyper-extended. So it only sustained some scratches on the back of its housing, no breakages.

When both cars are pointing in the same direction the mirrors spoon i.e are not face to face, so the force of the impact effects them differently.

Just in case someone wonders, we did not shoot, threaten or chase the other driver.

Which part of ‘the Minister was not even in Gzira’ don’t you understand?