Comments on: “Aw sir, gibtlek is-silg minghand il-klabb ta’ Hal Safi.”

By: J. CALLEJJA

J. CALLEJJA — Fri, 12 Dec 2014 07:12:40 +0000

X’ kilba ghandkom ghal Poter qed inighd !!! Issa m’hemx x’taghmel hlief tissaportu jiddispjacini habib !

By: caflanga

caflanga — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:13:59 +0000

Xugaman ahmar. Red bull. Il-flokk ahmar ta’ Manwel. Red flags.

By: tinu

tinu — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 15:12:52 +0000

In reply to J. CALLEJJA. Calleja, dahhal ftit sens f'mohhok u d-dahhalx lill Alla fin-nofs.

By: Mila

Mila — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:59:26 +0000

In reply to J. CALLEJJA.

One is loyal when with his professional conduct he promotes the institution and not when he suggests that evidence is removed before an inquiry. In such institutions there is and should be no distinctions between the lower ranks and others in the sense that there are rules and regulations for everyone, so it is not a question of loving one or the other, it is a question of being fair and just and following procedure.

In order to understand this it would be a good idea if you put yourself in the shoes of the person being shot at and how you would like it that the shooter was not arrested, processed, breathalyzed and that both cars were not treated as evidence and fully processed. How would you like it if the shooter got an enhanced telephone interview with the acting Commissioner?

Pointing out lies and injustices is not one of the things which should instil any fear of God. A criminal/crime can reach anyone at any time.

By: vanni

vanni — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:54:38 +0000

In reply to vanni. Mela intom mhux Alla halaqkhom? Jidispjacini siehbi.

By: J Callejja

J Callejja — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 10:16:27 +0000

In reply to vanni. la dardartu l-alla li halaqkom biex forsi tigbru naqra voti b' dal-kaz

By: vanni

vanni — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:26:14 +0000

In reply to J. CALLEJJA. Il-Prim Ministru tant jisthi min Alla li halqu li gaghlu jirrezenja.

By: Alf

Alf — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:22:58 +0000

The inquiry report page 4 states “Silvio Scerri ……. fl-ahhar ikkonferma li kien ircievieha (l-istqarrija originali) u ghamel l-input tieghu fiha, fosthom iz-zieda tal-kliem “fl-ajru””.

The above shows that whilst it was the Acting Commissioner who referred to “warning shots”, it was Silvio Scerri who added the words “fl-ajru”.

Since, according to the inquiry report, ex-Acting Commissioner contributed towards some sort of cover-up, I wish to be illuminated how the report exculpated Silvio Scerri?

By: J. CALLEJJA

J. CALLEJJA — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:11:04 +0000

Nixtieq inkun naf x’ ghamel hazin hawn l-ex kumissarju? li dejjem kien mahbub minn ta’ rank izghar minnu
Bniedem li dejjem kien leali lejn il-korp u jibqa , bniedem li dejjem habb iz-zighir.
Nixtieq nistaqsik jekk int tisthix min Alla li halqek ?

By: pablo

pablo — Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:03:32 +0000

In reply to canon.

That’s my feeling too. I see it in his refusal to resign.

Muscat gave him 24 hours to go quietly and yet moved on him before that time expired.

I think Mallia challenged his co-conspirator to do the dirty on him. Muscat bluffed back by announcing intention to appoint Mallia’s replacement.

Mallia holds his nerve. Toni Abela is sent out to talk to him but to no avail. He then has to be replaced without a resignation announcement, but still holds a better hand than Joe Muscat.