The “primary reason” for sex does not mean that it is the “only” reason.

It means that there are other secondary reasons that are valid when the primary one is unattainable.

If that were so the complicated anatomical and physiology elements of human biology precisely attuned to conception, pregnancy and delivery would not be necessary but it is a maxim that nature does not act in vain.

Pleasure can also be derived with sex with lower animals.

If you argument was sound bestiality would be just as acceptable as well as sodomy. Don’t tell me that you are also in favour of it. Surprise me.

I am not surprised that those in favour of aberrant sex exclusively for self-gratification would try to ridicule practitioners of a normal sex activity that is actually essential to preserve the human race.

But I would expect that they would try to produce logical arguments not only feeble attempts to mock and insult heterosexuals without whom the gay person would never have existed.

So now we’re comparing the expression of intimacy between two gay persons on the same lines as bestiality, in addition to criminals.

Congratulations on your insight and empathy with those people who were not born exactly like you.

To PRACTISE a sex act that always deliberately excludes the natural anatomical and physiological purpose of the human body to perpetuate the human race is an aberration and just as antisocial as kleptomania etc.

You may just as well advocate human sexual intimacy between man and animal as something desirable and acceptable.

Do you really believe that?

A lot are in-your-face look-at-me-I’m-gay-and-proud-of-it.

How many straight CEOs would state publicly ‘I’m blessed because I’m straight’ just as Tim Cook said ‘I’m blessed because I’m gay’?

I have nothing against gay people, as long as they don’t regard themselves as different or special and have to tell us about it.

I’d find it annoying if anyone came up to me and said ‘I’m filthy rich – unlike you.’

I couldn’t care less about others’ wealth or sexuality and to flaunt either is offensive to me.

Disgusting opinion, on par to racism. Why pray is homosexuality a defect? Consider that current psychiatric based science does not consider homosexuality a mental disorder. Also antisocial, how is this so?

Remember that homosexuality is a tangible part of nature. Biological observation has noted this in many species as well as lifetime homosexual relationships. Just because it is something that is not part of your being, does not make it some disease or malformation.

I am making a legitimate comparison between those who are born with the homosexual trait with others who are also “born” with other defects and who are not excused by society when they give vent to their antisocial urges.