The public is not aware at all. You make the classic error of extrapolating from yourself and your circle of friends.

The public is very much aware of Debono’s behaviour, so saying that you replied for a public-interest reason isn’t very credible.

I hate to have to say this, but democracy is wasted on people who think as you do.

If your memory serves you well, it was Lawrence Gonzi who had said that Franco Debono was irrelevant, which effectively meant that he should be ignored.

You yourself repeat many times over that the Joseph Muscat gets a kick out of appointing people like Franco Debono to certain positions. I am sure he knows how Franco Debono reacts and behaves.

The fact that literally everyone knows how Debono behaves means that your exchange with him was basically useless. What’s the point of highlighting something we already know?

Rubbish. If that were the case, no man earning an average wage or salary would ever be married or reproduce. Good earning power is necessary only for men who lack other attractions.

I know. But they look askance at a man who earns far less. Mine did. That’s how the whole thing ended.