Comments on: UPDATED/Keith Schembri can’t sue the Opposition leader for libel. There’s more than one smoking gun.

By: Benny Hill

Benny Hill — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 22:35:00 +0000

New Labour has come and gone. That was Alfred Sant actually. Joseph Muscat’s labour was post-New Labour. But, in reality, it was a regression from Sant’s Labour.

By: Xkamun

Xkamun — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:47:00 +0000

I wonder if the midwife’s been busy in Jordan as well.

By: pronoia

pronoia — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:19:00 +0000

Unfortunately if you go in on fb you will truly understand how ignorant many are, on this matter.

By: Esteve

Esteve — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:11:00 +0000

In reply to Daphne Caruana Galizia. And that's the tragedy. Citizens' faith in politicians has now been irreversibly damaged.

By: ghalgolhajt.com

ghalgolhajt.com — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:08:00 +0000

In reply to Noel Buttigieg Scicluna. Public accountants and auditors prohibited at law from giving advice that will result in tax evasion and money laundering. Brian Tonna and Nexia BT should be investigated by the Accountancy Board, the Commissioner for Revenue and the Police, but they have probably been working overtime to cover their tracks.

By: Daphne Caruana Galizia

Daphne Caruana Galizia — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:28:00 +0000

Wasn’t Joseph’s just that?

By: Daphne Caruana Galizia

Daphne Caruana Galizia — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:25:00 +0000

No, thank you. I’ll leave that up to their ghastly wives who married them for money and obviously think it’s wertit (except for the one who ran off to China).

By: Curious Citizen

Curious Citizen — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:45:00 +0000

Had Daphne Caruana Galizia never published such shocking facts, would Konrad Mizzi and Keith Schembri have informed the public of their secret holdings? Schembri is still refusing to admit to his Panama company.

Who can believe the Prime Minister when he claimed that he learned about his favourite pet’s engagement in such a financial obscenity in Panama a few weeks ago in draft form?

Who will believe the Prime Minister, who holds a world record in blessing irregularities and defending his party scoundrels, that he was not aware of his henchman Keith Schembri’s Panama company?

The Prime Minister has two henchmen, Keith Schembri and Konrad Mizzi, and they both had New Zealand trusts set up for them to hold identical Panamanian companies at exactly the same time by the same financial consultant. How, therefore, are we to believe that the Prime Minister does not have the exact same thing and that he is not involved with them too? There is no way they did this behind his back.

How can the Prime Minister of an EU member state retain Konrad Mizzi and Keith Schembri in their posts when their action is definitely not consonant with the EU’s blacklisting of Panama?

How can we call Malta a democratic country when the people’s will – those who voted Muscat and his gang of villains into government – Is flouted daily?

I call on all journalists to help us get rid of this incredible rubbish by hounding them to find out even more of what they are up to behind our backs.

By: Claude Sciberras

Claude Sciberras — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:43:00 +0000

The elves are probably all working at fullspeed trying to find out how you got this information and who gave it to you. And now tell us whose company/trust is the triplet.

By: Godfrey Leone Ganado

Godfrey Leone Ganado — Sun, 28 Feb 2016 17:34:00 +0000

Are you that convinced that there are just two scheming individuals?