Comments on: They shouldn’t be saying what they would do in Konrad Mizzi’s place

By: Tabatha_White

Tabatha_White — Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:06:00 +0000

And then to have Marlene Farrugia, his companion, on the speaker’s podium at the protest demonstration on Sunday. She waters down all the effect. I’m so against this lack of moral stand and this weird, crazy hypocrisy.

I don’t give a rat’s arse about what Marlene Farrugia has to say. She shares the same bed and has a definite conflict of interest.

By: Phaedrus

Phaedrus — Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:06:00 +0000

Criticising the Prime Minister could perhaps be a career limiting action.

By: Francis Saliba MD

Francis Saliba MD — Thu, 14 Apr 2016 07:56:00 +0000

“They shouldn’t be saying what they would do in Konrad Mizzi’s place”
Of course not.

If “they” have a vote in Parliament they should be supporting the motion of no confidence to add some value to otherwise empty words and would otherwise appear to be lacking conviction and insincere.

The Premier himself and Keith Schembri are in the same boat as Konrad Mizzi and they are rowing energetially in unison with him.

By: Peritocracy

Peritocracy — Thu, 14 Apr 2016 07:11:00 +0000

Joseph Muscat is not sacking Konrad Mizzi and Keith Schembri because he is involved. Punto e basta.

I can’t believe there are people still asking why he is defending them, because there is no other logical explanation.

How deeply is Joseph Muscat involved? What leverage have the other two got on him?

Is he powerless because they’ve got his money, or is it something else?

By: Spock

Spock — Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:52:00 +0000

Sant is protecting his poodle .