Yes. I wanted to respect the reply I got by leaving my error.

Konrad Mizzi and Keith Schembri also used the same wording to describe their current source of funds “savings from dividends”. I do not recall that Mizzi ever mentioned, in his declaration, draft and final, that he had shares in a company.

True, but then if a change has to come about now, I would prefer the Labour administration to include these persons rather than the frauds we have now.

There is no audit into Konrad Mizzi’s affairs. That was a red herring.

It is important to highlight that the reasons for the income given by Konrad Mizzi and Keith Schembri are a photocopy “consultancy services to various entities around the world”.

May I suggest that Schembri and Mizzi publish copies of the letters of engagement between their Panama companies and the clients to whom they are/will be giving the service, highlighting hourly charge-out rates, details of the service and the dates and places of the supply of service.

They may also wish to show us how transparent they are by exempting Brian Tonna/ Karl Cini/Nexia BT/Mossack Fonseca from professional secrecy and authorising them to publish all information and documentation relating to their companies/trusts/dealings.

Incidentally, what happened to the audit into Konrad Mizzi’s affairs?

“Failing to plan is planning to fail” as somebody once said.