Indeed he probably does not. It is probably a New Zealand trust that owns Egrant. Who then owns the New Zealand trust? The question needs to be worded in a very exact manner.

They weren’t looking for one.

What he actually said is that with the terms of reference to audit all banks around the world, it is very hard to find someone to do the audit.

Hence, I presume, he found no one to do the audit which actually means there is no audit. QED.

Back in Febuary in Hal Far he was asked by Mario Frendo if he also owns a company in Panama. His reply was “No, I don’t”.

What Joseph Muscat said on Dissett is that it is difficult to find an international audit firm to certify that bank accounts were empty.

This is a prelude to telling us that, as no audit could be carried out, Konrad and Keith are telling the truth.

What significance does this have in relation to the Companies Registration Act? Have these become two different companies?

There are so many claimed coincidences in all this hotchpotch. Was this done purposely to evade being caught in obvious corruption?

Woulfn’t it have been headline news of that were the case?