Sounds very similar to the way we refer to an unborn baby as a ‘viable or non-viable fetus .’

Le ta’ Daphne, ghadek ma rajtx kemm-il post kitbet illi the PN is ‘her party’. Panic.

Or does it contradict the core ideology set out by that online misandry central where reproductive sex is inherently rape, babies are parasites and oppression and the Niqab empowering?

I mean, will you engage debate with CIS heteronormative males, or is that acknowledging the patriarchy?

Troll alert everyone. From 2013’s true nationalists to something something something nationalist.

Privilege and its infinite degrees next. To all gay men, you’re as oppressive as Donald Trump in this new vocabulary. Blame Milo.

“Their” men, when they’re allowed to speak to you under that umbrella, too. In reality they each cultivate a role for themselves within that group and guard it mercilessly. If you’re not a threat on that basis, welcome in. Utter boredom.

Quite farcical really.

We discuss current issues amongst other things. I thought it was normal to discuss that which is going on around you but each to their own I guess.

Nothing worse than having little knowledge. This phenomenon with middle-aged women inventing a role is also key to the Nationalist Party’s philosophical rut. Something to do with Mintoff’s lost generation seeing their children leave.

I think the post Berlin wall 90s is still alive and well in the minds of some people in the Nationalist Party. They still delude under debate immune to the rise of the soft Left with its development of grievance politics rendering everyone a victim of society.

And when relativism turns all positions equal, style obviously the weapon of oppressive borghesi, therefore to overcome, Fenech Conti is no more than another Astrid Vella.

The rise of nisa’ ta’ success then, as agents of change, and utterly infallible, was always the Left’s preferred guerilla tactic. As the Nationalists, bless their Demo-Christian prudery, enjoyed its pickings without a care for what mayhem the faux intrepid and invidious could cause.

What is poisonous is Fenech Conti’s aversion and careful avoidance of any meaning, indeed meaning itself and that’s purely this new Left.

I cannot repeat this enough; genuine liberals of the English Protestant ethic beware, they’ve studied your every mode of enunciation to morph groupthink.

Notice how both cherish their very exclusive piece of cyberspace with occasional forays into enemy territory. It’s how anti-politics turn potently destructive and why political parties must explore which metamorphosis to survive.

It’s public space that’s under attack, public space is where freedom gets its oxygen. It would be interesting to demand what degree of leftist crony economic endeavour Fenech Conti may be after. Which is why she reacts by denying any interest. No shame.

The Nationalists had better sell Pieta’ and exist as a disruptive force in this new online space. I still haven’t figured how they manage to take all this crap keeping it to themselves.

Spare us the not-all-insert minority here blurb. Why do you progressives still resort to the mechanics of political correctness to move away from the challenge? You are truly the oppressive nature of a gerontocratic establishment.