<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It was Nationalist governments, not Labour, which changed the lives of Maltese women permanently for the better	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/</link>
	<description>Daphne Caruana Galizia is a journalist working in Malta.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3143231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3143231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[By everyone in Malta, including the women themselves, and not by the Nationalist Party. But the essential point is that Labour was in power in the years 1971 to 1987, when changes were being made to the situation of women throughout Europe. And yet Prime Ministers Mintoff and KMB did nothing and kept the abominable situation exactly as it was in the 1960s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By everyone in Malta, including the women themselves, and not by the Nationalist Party. But the essential point is that Labour was in power in the years 1971 to 1987, when changes were being made to the situation of women throughout Europe. And yet Prime Ministers Mintoff and KMB did nothing and kept the abominable situation exactly as it was in the 1960s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3143152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3143152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[More rubbish. You&#039;re talking here to a woman who was an adult - both married and unmarried - under the Labour government of the 1980s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More rubbish. You&#8217;re talking here to a woman who was an adult &#8211; both married and unmarried &#8211; under the Labour government of the 1980s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3143151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3143151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rubbish. Research your history properly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rubbish. Research your history properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3143150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 10:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3143150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your fiancé must have misunderstood. Since the change to the law in 1993, mothers and fathers have EQUAL rights over their children. Your fiancé was asked for the child&#039;s father&#039;s signature precisely because of that. He would have had to get her signature too if the children were in HIS care and not hers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your fiancé must have misunderstood. Since the change to the law in 1993, mothers and fathers have EQUAL rights over their children. Your fiancé was asked for the child&#8217;s father&#8217;s signature precisely because of that. He would have had to get her signature too if the children were in HIS care and not hers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NoThanks		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142612</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NoThanks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3142612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142605&quot;&gt;Daphne Caruana Galizia&lt;/a&gt;.

No that&#039;s not the kind I&#039;m talking about at all, although I&#039;m sure what you mention happens as well.

I&#039;m talking about men who want a wife and a family, who pair up with a woman who doesn&#039;t, or maybe doesn&#039;t with him. But he&#039;s a good man, works hard and respects her so she goes for it. And what&#039;s a young woman in the 70s to do if not get married by 22.

And he becomes a means to an end. Works 2 or 3 jobs to keep things going, and because she has no real love for him, she spends her days going for coffee mornings and spending money on crap, and never thinks of the family unit as a team pulling together.

 You&#039;ll generally find these kind of women to be wannabe social climbers, and they&#039;re not as rare a species as you make them out to be.

These certainly exist as well and I could pull a few names of the top of my head, and many more if I stopped to think a bit. As a woman, you wouldn&#039;t hear about them, as the details are normally shared over a beer or whisky too many.

It&#039;s one of the reasons I oppose people who want to &quot;save&quot; marriages no matter what. Sometimes a marriage shouldn&#039;t be saved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142605">Daphne Caruana Galizia</a>.</p>
<p>No that&#8217;s not the kind I&#8217;m talking about at all, although I&#8217;m sure what you mention happens as well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about men who want a wife and a family, who pair up with a woman who doesn&#8217;t, or maybe doesn&#8217;t with him. But he&#8217;s a good man, works hard and respects her so she goes for it. And what&#8217;s a young woman in the 70s to do if not get married by 22.</p>
<p>And he becomes a means to an end. Works 2 or 3 jobs to keep things going, and because she has no real love for him, she spends her days going for coffee mornings and spending money on crap, and never thinks of the family unit as a team pulling together.</p>
<p> You&#8217;ll generally find these kind of women to be wannabe social climbers, and they&#8217;re not as rare a species as you make them out to be.</p>
<p>These certainly exist as well and I could pull a few names of the top of my head, and many more if I stopped to think a bit. As a woman, you wouldn&#8217;t hear about them, as the details are normally shared over a beer or whisky too many.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one of the reasons I oppose people who want to &#8220;save&#8221; marriages no matter what. Sometimes a marriage shouldn&#8217;t be saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3142605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;ll find that when wives turn nasty, it&#039;s when they&#039;ve been on the receiving end of years of their husband&#039;s nastiness. When the wife is vulnerable in the early years of marriage - vulnerable because generally there are young children and she is financially dependent - the husband bullies her, tortures her financially and emotionallt and treats her like shit.  Then the children grow up, she regains some of her autonomy, and rounds on him.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find that when wives turn nasty, it&#8217;s when they&#8217;ve been on the receiving end of years of their husband&#8217;s nastiness. When the wife is vulnerable in the early years of marriage &#8211; vulnerable because generally there are young children and she is financially dependent &#8211; the husband bullies her, tortures her financially and emotionallt and treats her like shit.  Then the children grow up, she regains some of her autonomy, and rounds on him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3142597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s OK - all welcome aboard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s OK &#8211; all welcome aboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3142592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#039;You parish&#039;

Phonetic spelling hits Maltese English.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;You parish&#8217;</p>
<p>Phonetic spelling hits Maltese English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142586</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3142586</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I always thought he married her to symbolically conquer, abuse and oppress the British from that stratum of society (the ones, in other words, that his father worked for as a navy cook).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought he married her to symbolically conquer, abuse and oppress the British from that stratum of society (the ones, in other words, that his father worked for as a navy cook).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daphne Caruana Galizia		</title>
		<link>https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/2017/07/95547/#comment-3142584</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Caruana Galizia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://daphnecaruanagalizia.com/?p=95547#comment-3142584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very odd, because single women couldn&#039;t get home loans from the Lohombus Corporation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very odd, because single women couldn&#8217;t get home loans from the Lohombus Corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 14/23 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: daphnecaruanagalizia.com @ 2026-04-09 17:57:51 by W3 Total Cache
-->